Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10699 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2022
WP.Nos.8039 & 8040 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
WP.Nos.8039 & 8040 of 2010
and
MP.Nos.1 & 2 of 2010
Kubota Agriculture Machinery India Pvt. Ltd.,
Rep. by its Deputy Managing Director,
Masayasu Otsuka,
Olympia Tech Park,
No.1, Sidco Industrial Estate, Guindy,
Chennai-600 032. ... Petitioner in both WPs
Vs
The Assistant Commissioner (CT),
Guindy Assessment Circle,
No.46, Greenways road,
Chennai-600 028. ... Respondent in WP.8039/2010
and R2 in WP.No.8040/2010
The State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by its Secretary to Government,
Commercial Taxes Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai-600 009. ... R1 in WP.No.8040 of 2010
Prayer in WP.No.8039 of 2010: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the impugned
Proceedings of the Respondent passed in RC.No.1488 of 2009 dated 16.06.2009
and quash the same.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1
WP.Nos.8039 & 8040 of 2010
Prayer in WP.No.8040 of 2010: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Declaration, to declare that the
provisions of Sub-sections (d), (g), of Section 2 and Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu
Tax On Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act 1990 is not applicable in
respect of motor vehicles imported by the petitioner from outside the country as
the impugned levy is being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 286 & 304(b) of
the Constitution of India.
(In both WPs)
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Murali
For Respondent : Mr.C.Harsha Raj
Additional Government Pleader
COMMON ORDER
The issue that arises in WP.No.8040 of 2010, which seeks a declaration
that the provisions of Sub-sections (d) and (g) of Section 2 and Section 3 of the
Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990 are not
applicable in respect of motor vehicles imported by the petitioner from outside
the country as being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 286 and 304(b) of the
Constitution of India, stands squarely covered against the petitioner by the
judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Kerala and
Others vs. Fr. William Fernandez Etc. (2017 SCC Online SC 1291).
2. WP.No.8040 of 2010 is thus dismissed. No costs. Connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
3.As far as WP.No.8039 of 2010 is concerned, the challenge is to a notice
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
WP.Nos.8039 & 8040 of 2010
dated 16.06.2009. While the legal issue stands decided against the petitioner as
above, since the proceedings are at a preliminary stage and the petitioner states
that there are certain factual particulars that have to be submitted to the
Assessing Authority, the impugned notice is confirmed, granting liberty to the
petitioner to respond to the same within a period of three (3) weeks from today.
Upon receipt of the reply, the Assessing Authority shall call upon and hear the
petitioner and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of four (4)
weeks from date of receipt of the objection.
4.With this, W.P.No.8039 of 2010 stands disposed. No costs. Connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
21.06.2022
vs
Index : Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non speaking Order
To
1.The Assistant Commissioner (CT),
Guindy Assessment Circle,
No.46, Greenways road,
Chennai-600 028.
2.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by its Secretary to Government,
Commercial Taxes Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai-600 009.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3
WP.Nos.8039 & 8040 of 2010
DR.ANITA SUMANTH,J.
vs
WP.Nos.8039 & 8040 of 2010 and MP.Nos.1 & 2 of 2010
21.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!