Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tnstc Ltd Rep By Its Md vs Mrs. Vanaja
2022 Latest Caselaw 10599 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10599 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2022

Madras High Court
Tnstc Ltd Rep By Its Md vs Mrs. Vanaja on 20 June, 2022
                                                                                     CMA.No.912 of 2022


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED : 20.06.2022

                                                             CORAM

                                    THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

                                               CMA.No.912 of 2022 and
                                                C.M.P.No.6775 of 2022

                     TNSTC LTD Rep by its MD
                     (Villupuram)
                     No.3/137,Salamedu Vazhathareddi Post
                     Villupuram 605 602.                  ... Appellant/Respondent
                                                     Vs

                     1. Mrs. Vanaja
                     2. Mrs Hemalathai
                     3. Mrs Usha
                     4. Mr. Radhakrishnan
                     5. Mrs Devasana
                                                                     ... Respondents/Petitioners

                     PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,
                     to allow the appeal and by setting aside the judgment and decree dated 26-
                     08-2019 made in MCOP No.8756 of 2015, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal
                     II Small Causes Court at Chennai.


                                    For Petitioner       :     M/s. Mishra Sathya Seeman




                                                       JUDGEMENT

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.912 of 2022

The Transport Corporation has challenged the award passed in

M.C.O.P.No.8756 of 2015 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (II Court

Small Causes, Chennai). The facts in brief are as follows:-

2. The deceased Kailasasivam was travelling in the respondent's bus

bearing Registration No.TN-32-N-3341 and proceeding on the GST Road,

Urappkkam. The driver of the bus in which the deceased was traveling was

driving the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner without following the

basic traffic rules and hit another bus bearing Route No.243 M and

Registration No.TN-68-N-0623, as a result of which the said Kailasasivam

had sustained grievous injuries and had died on 31.05.2015, on account of

the injuries. The wife, children and mother of the deceased Kailasasivam had

filed the above claim petition seeking compensation of a sum of

Rs.30,00,000/- (Thirty Lakhs Only).

2. The respondent had entered appearance and filed a counter denying

the negligence on the part of their driver and had also raised a doubt as to

whether the deceased was a bonafide passenger in the said bus. They had

also submitted that the compensation that was claimed was very high.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.912 of 2022

3. The Tribunal below after considering the FIR (Ex.P.1), Death

Report (Ex.P.3) and Death Certificate (Ex.P.4) has held that the accident

had taken place only on account of rash and negligent driving of the driver

of the Corporation bus in which the deceased had travelled. While

calculating the compensation, the Tribunal has adopted a monthly income of

Rs.10,000/- relying upon Ex.P.10 (salary certificate). The Tribunal had

deducted 1/4th towards personal expenses and arrived at an annual

contribution at a sum of Rs.90,000/-. Taking into account the age of the

deceased which was 64 years, the multiplier adopted was '7' therefore, the

loss of dependency worked out at a sum of Rs.6,30,000/-. Further a sum of

Rs.40,000/- has been awarded to the 1st respondent herein, the wife of the

deceased towards loss of consortium and the others have been awarded a

sum of Rs.10,000/- each under the head of loss of love and affection which

works out at a sum of Rs.40,000/-. Ultimately, the Tribunal has awarded a

total sum of Rs.8,20,000/- as a compensation. This award is challenged by

the Transport Corporation only on the ground of quantum and that too with

regard to the income adopted by the Tribunal.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.912 of 2022

4. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.

5. The Tribunal below has arrived at a compensation only on the basis

of the salary shown in Ex.P.10, (salary certificate). This document has not

been objected to by the appellant/Transport Corporation. On the contrary the

same has been marked without any objections. Further the appellant/

Transport Corporation has not been able to prove that Ex.P.10 is an invalid

document or that the deceased did not earn a salary of Rs.10,000/-.

6. In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal fails and it stands

dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is

dismissed.

20.06.2022 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No shr

To

1. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II Small Causes Court at Chennai.

2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.912 of 2022

P.T. ASHA, J,

shr

CMA.No.912 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.6775 of 2022

20.06.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter