Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10287 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 June, 2022
W.P.No.11549 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.06.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P.No.11549 of 2022
and W.M.P.No.11035 and 11036 of 2022
Vikrant Choudhary .. Petitioner
vs
1. The Central Board of Direct Tax,
Government of India, Ministry of
Finance, Department of Revenue,
New Delhi, Rep. by its Secretary.
2. The Income Tax Officer,
Corporate Ward 6 (3),
No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. .. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the
Respondents and quash a) the impugned notice in PAN dated
30.06.2021 in DIN and Notice No. ITBA/AST/S/148/2021-22/
1033868625(1) issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act 1961
for the Assessment Year 2017-18 issued by the Second Respondent;
and b) the Explanation to Clause A of the Notification in Notification
No.20/2021/F.No.370142/35/2020-TPL in S.O.1432 (E) dated
31.03.2021 as modified by Notification in Notification No.38/2021/
___________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.11549 of 2022
F.No.370142/35/2020-TPL in S.O. 1703 (E) dated 27.04.2021 issued
under the The Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation And Amendment
of Certain Provisions) Act 2020 by the First Respondent to the extent
it is violative of the provisions of the said Act.
For the Petitioner : M/s.N.V.Lakshmi
For the Respondents : Mr.A.P.Srinivas
Sr. SPC
*****
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The writ petition has been filed to challenge the notice issued
under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment
Year 2017-18 and also the notification dated 31.03.2021 as
modified by notification No.38/2021/F.No370142/35/2020-TPL
dated 27.04.2021 issued under the Taxation and other Laws
(Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020.
2. Similar writ petitions were allowed by this Court. However,
the matters decided initially by the Allahabad High Court on the
similar issue travelled to the Apex Court where a detailed judgment
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.11549 of 2022
has been given in the case of Union of India vs. Ashish
Agarwal, reported in (2022) 138 taxmann.com 64 (SC). The
parties are in agreement that now the present writ petition would
be governed by the judgment of the Apex Court in the case supra.
Accordingly, the issue in the writ petition would be governed
by the judgment of the Apex Court supra and with the aforesaid,
the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently,
W.M.P.Nos.11035 and 11036 of 2022 are closed.
(M.N.B., CJ.) (N.M., J.) 15.06.2022 Index : Yes/No sra
To:
1. The Secretary, Central Board of Direct Tax, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi.
2. The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 6 (3), No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034.
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.11549 of 2022
M.N.Bhandari, CJ.
and N.Mala, J.
(sra)
W.P.No.11549 of 2022
15.06.2022
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!