Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10095 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2022
Crl.O.P.No.2271 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
Crl.O.P.No.2271 of 2022
D.Roopavathi ... Petitioner
Vs.
The state of Tamilnadu rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
Uthukottai police Station,
Uthukottai,
Thiruvallur District. ... Respondent
PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,
praying, to direct the respondent to reinvestigate the case and register the
complaint in accordance with the complaint dated 21.12.2021 preferred by the
petitioner with regard to offences of cheating, abatement of suicide and
misappropriation of sale consideration of Rs.11,05,500/- under Section 305,
403 and 420 of IPC.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.E.Ekambaram
For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan
Additional Public Prosecutor.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.2271 of 2022
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent
to reinvestigate the case and register the complaint in accordance with the
complaint dated 21.12.2021 preferred by the petitioner with regard to offences
of cheating, abatement of suicide and misappropriation of sale consideration of
Rs.11,05,500/- under Sections 305, 403 and 420 of IPC.
2. Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for
the respondent would submit that based on the complaint given by the
petitioner, enquiry has been conducted and the same is pending on the file of
the respondent police.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.
4. The Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The
Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489 and the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench
in M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.2271 of 2022
upon Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot
issue any direction for registration of FIR. High Court can intervene only in
extraordinary circumstances and rare cases. However, taking note of the fact
that the complaint is now pending and not been enquired, the Investigation
officer is directed to issue notice to the parties and conduct enquiry as directed
by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of
Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)]. If any cognizable offence is
made out, the respondent police is bound to register the FIR otherwise they may
close the complaint. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of two
weeks from today.
5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is
disposed of.
14.06.2022 Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order
nr/shk
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.2271 of 2022
N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.
nr/shk
To
1.The Inspector of Police, Uthukottai police Station, Uthukottai, Thiruvallur District.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.2271 of 2022
14.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!