Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10063 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2022
Crl.OP.No.6347 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
Crl.O.P.No.6347 of 2022
1.G.Rajalakshmi
2.G.Karthick ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai,
Vepery, Chennai 600 007.
2.State represented by
The Inspector of Police,
K-11, Koyembedu Police Station,
Chennai 600 107.
3.Sucharitha Madanagopal
4.L.Kaviyarasan
5.H.Ramakrishnan
6.The Inspector of Police,
Central Crime Branch,
O/o.The Commissioner of Police,
Vepery, Egmore,
Chennai 600 007.
(R6 impleaded as per order in Crl.M.P.No.4278/2022
in Crl.O.P.No.6347/2022 dated 05.04.2022) ... Respondents
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.6347 of 2022
PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to
direct the respondents 1 & 2 herein, to register the complaint dated 07.05.2021,
19.10.2021 and further complaint dated 26.10.2021 given by the petitioners to the
first respondent Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai 7.
For Petitioners : Mr.A.M.Packianathan Easter
For Respondents : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan for R1, R2 & R6,
Additional Public Prosecutor.
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the
respondents 1 & 2 herein, to register the complaint dated 07.05.2021, 19.10.2021
and further complaint dated 26.10.2021 given by the petitioners to the first
respondent Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai 7.
2. Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted
that the enquiry has been conducted and the same has been closed by the sixth
respondent police.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.6347 of 2022
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional
Public Prosecutor for the respondents 1, 2 & 6.
4.In such view of the matter, liberty is given to the petitioner to workout his
remedy as per law. The Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The
Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489 and the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench in
M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying upon
Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot issue any
direction for registration of FIR. High Court can intrevene only in extraordinary
circumstances and rare cases. It is for the petitioner to pursue his right as per
Code.
5. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.
14.06.2022 Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order shk/nr
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.6347 of 2022
N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.
shk/nr To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.
2.The Inspector of Police, K-11, Koyembedu Police Station, Chennai 600 107.
3.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Egmore, Chennai 600 007. Crl.O.P.No.6347 of 2022
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.
14.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!