Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10035 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2022
TCA.No.431 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
T.C.A.No.431 of 2011
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Cooper Bussmann India (P) Ltd.,
No.3A, EVR Street, Sedarapet,
Pondicherry 605 111 ... Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “C”
Bench, dated 11.04.2008 in ITA.No.394/Mds/2007.
For Appellant : Mr. J. Narayanaswamy
Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr. Joseph Prabakar
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TCA.No.431 of 2011
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the appellant / revenue,
questioning the correctness of the order dated 11.4.2008 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Chennai in
ITA.No.394/Mds/2007.
2. On 11.10.2011, the appeal was admitted by this Court raising the
following substantial questions of law;
'1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee is entitled to the benefit of Section 80HHC, when such a claim was made neither in the original return nor in the revised return, and no audit report was filed even during the assessment proceedings?
2. Whether a claim for deduction under Section 80HHC could have been validly entertained by the CIT(A), when it was not made before the assessing officer, and the assessment was made under Section 144 after rejection of books of accounts?'
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA.No.431 of 2011
3. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned
counsel for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the
Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct
Taxes, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not
exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the
tax effect in this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned
counsel for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax
effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as
withdrawn, keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination
in an appropriate case. No costs.
[R.M.D,J.] [M.S.Q.,
J.]
14.06.2022
msr
Index : Yes / No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA.No.431 of 2011
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
msr
To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Chennai.
T.C.A.No.431 of 2011
14.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!