Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10006 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2022
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.7499 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 14.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
CRL.O.P (MD) No.7499 of 2022
T.Thanga Arasu ... Petitioner/ sole Accused
Vs
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Kanyakumari District,
Nagercoil,
Kanyakumari. .... 1st Respondent/Nil
2. The Inspector of Police,
Kanyakumari Police Station,
Kanyakumari District. .... 2nd respondent/Complainant
3. Sathyabama ... 3rd Respondent/ De-facto Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C,
praying to call for the records in connection with the C.C.No.6 of 2022 on
the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Nagercoil and quash the same in
respect of the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.M.Suresh
For R1 & R2 : Mr.A.Albert James
Government Advocate (Crl.side)
For R3 : Mr.G.Kalidoss
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.7499 of 2022
ORDER
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the Charge
Sheet in C.C.No.6 of 2022 on the file of the Additional Mahila Court,
Nagercoil for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 354, 294(b),
506(ii) of IPC and under Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of
Harassment of Women Act 2002, in Crime No.127 of 2018.
2.The case is under trial. By passage of time, the parties have decided
to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among
themselves.
3. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court
which have been signed by the petitioner and the third respondent and also
by their respective counsel. The petitioner and the third respondent were
also present in person before this Court and they were identified by the
learned Government Advocate and Mr.R.John Rajan, SSI of Police,
Kanyakumari Police Station. This Court also enquired both the parties and
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.7499 of 2022
was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between
themselves.
4. In the instant case, the dispute is of personal in nature and the
parties had compromised. Where the parties have compromised the matter,
the High Court has to power to quash the complaint for the offence under
Sections 452, 354, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC r/w 4 of TNWHA.
5. The legal position expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case
of Gian Singh vs. State of Panjab and another reported in (2012)10 SCC
303 and Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath)
reported in (2017)9 SCC 641 were taken into consideration.
6. In the light of the guidelines issued in the above said Judgments of
the Hon'ble Apex Court, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the
proceedings in C.C.No.6 of 2022 pending before the Additional Mahila
Court, Nagercoil, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable
in nature.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.7499 of 2022
7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as
a sequel, the proceedings in C.C.No.6 of 2022, on the file of the Additional
Mahila Court, Nagercoil is quashed and the terms of joint compromise
memo shall form part and parcel of this order.
14.06.2022
Internet:Yes./No (2/2)
Index:Yes/no
ebsi
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.7499 of 2022
To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari.
2. The Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari Police Station, Kanyakumari District
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.7499 of 2022
V.SIVAGNANAM, J.
ebsi
ORDER IN CRL.O.P (MD) No.7499 of 2022
14.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!