Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10004 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2022
T.C.A.No.566 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.06.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
T.C.A.No.566 of 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai. ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Sanmar Speciality Chemicals Ltd.,
9, Cathedral Road,
Chennai 600 086
PAN:AABCS0201P ...
Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “A” Bench,
dated 18.12.2015 in I.TA.No.1360/Mds/2015.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanasamy
Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.R.Venkatenarayanan
for Mr.Subbaraya Aiyar
Page 1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.566 of 2017
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) This tax case appeal has been filed by the appellant / Revenue,
challenging the order dated 18.12.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.No.1360/Mds/2015, relating to the
assessment year 2011-12.
2. By order dated 05.12.2017, this court admitted the aforesaid tax
case appeal on the following substantial questions of law:
“(i) Whether freight and clearing expenses incurred in foreign exchange is to be included while computing deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
(ii) Whether the learned Tribunal erred in law in including freight and clearing expenses incurred in foreign exchange for the purpose of computing deduction under Section10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
(iii) Whether the decision of the Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of ITO vs. Sak Soft Ltd., reported in (2009) 313 ITR 353, is correct in law?
(iv) Whether Section 14A of the Income Tax Act read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules applies even when the assessee has not received any dividend income?
Page 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.No.566 of 2017
3.When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeal shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not
exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax
effect in this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4.In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is said
to be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn,
keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in an
appropriate case. No costs.
(R.M.D., J.) (M.S.Q., J.)
14.06.2022
Internet : Yes
Index : Yes / No
Page 3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.No.566 of 2017
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
av
To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench, Chennai,
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Corporate Circle 6(1), Aayakar Bhavan, New Block, Chennai - 600 034.
4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 15, Chennai.
T.C.A.No.566 of 2017
14.06.2022 (2/2)
Page 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!