Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12058 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2022
TR.C.M.P(MD).No.96 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 06.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
TR.C.M.P(MD).No.96 of 2022
and
C.M.P(MD).No.2075 of 2022
A.Jeyarani ... Petitioner
versus
P.Vijayarajeshwaran ... Respondent
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of
C.P.C, to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.33 of 2021 pending on the file of the
Family Court, Dindigul and transfer the same to the Sub Court, Tirupathur.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajini
For Respondent : No-appearance
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TR.C.M.P(MD).No.96 of 2022
ORDER
This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking
transfer of the proceedings in H.M.O.P.No. 33 of 2021 from the file of the
Family Court, Dindigul to the Sub Court, Tirupathur.
2. The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is the husband. The
marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on
21.06.2012, as per the Hindu Rites and Customs. Subsequently, due to some
difference of opinion, the respondent/husband has filed H.M.O.P.No. 33 of
2021 before the Family Court, Dindigul seeking divorce. Since the
petitioner/wife is a resident of Tirupathur, she filed this present Transfer
Civil Miscellaneous Petition to transfer the proceedings in H.M.O.P.No. 33
of 2021 from the file of the Family Court, Dindigul to the Sub Court,
Tirupathur.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that
the distance between Tirupathur and Dindigul is around 90 kms and it is
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.96 of 2022
very difficult for the petitioner to travel such a long distance for appearing
before the Family Court, Dindigul for each and every hearing.
4.Though notice was ordered to the respondent, there is no
representation for the respondent.
5.This Court, being satisfied with the reasons stated in the
affidavit filed in support of this petition and also taking into consideration
that it is well settled law that convenience of wife is to be taken into
consideration at the time of considering transfer applications as held by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgment reported in 2008(9)SCC 353 (Arti
Rani @ Pinki Devi and another Vs. Dharmendra Kumar Gupta), is
inclined to allow the present petition.
6.In the light of the above, this transfer civil miscellaneous
petition stands allowed. The proceedings in H.M.O.P.No. 33 of 2021 on the
file of the Family Court, Dindigul is withdrawn and ordered to be
transferred to the file of the Sub Court, Tirupathur. The learned Judge,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.96 of 2022
Family Court, Dindigul is directed to transmit the entire case records to the
Sub Court, Tirupathur forthwith and the learned Judge, Sub Court,
Tirupathur, who in turn shall dispose of the same as expeditiously as
possible. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is
closed.
06.07.2022 ssb Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes / No
To
1. The Family Court, Dindigul
2. The Sub Court, Tirupathur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.96 of 2022
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ssb
TR.C.M.P(MD).No.96 of 2022
06.07.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!