Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 909 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2022
CRP.PD.No.23/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
CRP.PD.No.23/2022 & CMP.No.173/2022
(Heard through Video Conferencing)
M.I.Maraikkaiyar Thambi ... Petitioner
Vs
1.Nazeer Ahamed
2.Haleel Rahman
represented by their Power of Attorney Agent
Mr.Mohamed Niamathullah ... Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings
[Lease and Rent Control] Act, amended by Act 23 of 1973 and 18 of 1960,
against the judgment and decreetal order dated 08.07.3032 in
RCA.No.1/2020 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, at Alandur
confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 20.03.2018 made in
MP.No.120/2017 in RCOP No.19/2011 on the file of the learned Principal
District Munsif, at Alandur.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Thangadurai
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP.PD.No.23/2022
ORDER
(1) The order under challenge is an order passed by the Appellate
Authority under the Tamil Nadu Buildings [Lease and Rent Control]
Act, dismissing the Appeal filed by the tenant challenging the order
dismissing an application seeking appointment of Commissioner to
measure the property with the help of the Civil Engineer and to file a
Report in a proceeding under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings
[Lease and Rent Control] Act.
(2) The learned Appellate Authority has rightly held that the order
challenged is not an appealable order under Section 23 of the Act as it
does not determine the rights of the parties. Further, the very prayer
sought for cannot be granted as it would amount to gathering evidence
through means of a Commissioner. In a proceeding under Section 4
of the Tamil Nadu Buildings [Lease and Rent Control] Act, 1960, the
parties are expected to lead evidence regarding the area, the
measurement and the value of the property, to enable the Court to
decide the fair rent as per the formula under Section 4 of the Act. The
landlord has done precisely that by filing the Report of the Civil
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.PD.No.23/2022
Engineer and examining the Civil Engineer. The learned counsel for
the tenant had also an opportunity to cross examine the Civil
Engineer. It is open to the tenant to have the property inspected by a
Civil Engineer, file his report and examine him as a witness in the
proceedings. The assistance of the Commissioner cannot be sought
for to lead evidence.
(3) Hence, I do not see any merit in this revision. The Civil Revision
Petition therefore fails and it is dismissed subject to the opportunity
to the tenant to file the Engineer's Report and examine the Engineer.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
20.01.2022
AP
Internet : Yes
Index : No
Speaking order: Yes
To
1.Subordinate Judge, Alandur.
2.Principal District Munsif, Alandur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.PD.No.23/2022
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
AP
CRP.PD.No.23/2022
20.01.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!