Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 900 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2022
S.A.No.1720 of 1999
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
S.A.No.1720 of 1999
and Cross Objection No.1 of 2020,
C.M.P.Nos.18239 & 8848 of 1999, and 158 of 2009
(Through Video Conference)
M.Akbar ... 1st Defendant / Appellant/
Appellant
Vs.
1) Majebee
2) Ghouse Unnissa
3) Minor Haisar
4) Minor Afsar
Minors 3 and 4 repd. by their mother
and natural guardian/ 1st respondent
5) Ansar @ Abdul Kapoor ... Plaintiffs/ RR 1 to 5/
Respondents
6) Rajendran ... 2nd Defendant/ R6/
Respondent
* R3 declared Major and R1 discharged from guardianship vide order of this Court dated 25.09.2003
made in C.M.P.No.5548 of 2002
____________
Page No.1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.1720 of 1999
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree of
the Court of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram in A.S.No.141 of
1997 dated 24.12.1998 in confirming the judgment and decree of the
Court of the Sub Judge, Tindivanam in O.S.No.49 of 1989 dated
29.03.1996.
For Appellant ... Mr.V.Raghavachari
For R-1 ... Died
For RR 3, 4 & 6 ... No Appearance
For RR 2 & 5 ... Mr.R.Muralidaran
******
JUDGMENT
Earlier, when the matter came up for hearing on 19.01.2021, it was
submitted before this Court that, the first respondent is no more. This
Court had granted adjournment for a period of three weeks for taking
steps to implead the legal heirs of the deceased first respondent.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned
counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that a letter has been
sent to his client, informing that the first respondent is dead. Thereafter,
no instruction has been received from the parties pertaining to the further
action to be taken in the above second appeal.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.1720 of 1999
3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the
appellant, this Second Appeal is Dismissed for non-prosecution. In view
of the same, no further orders are required in the cross objection petition
filed in Cross Objection No.1 of 2020. No costs. Consequently
connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
20.01.2022 Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order Index : Yes / No
sts
To:
1. The Principal District Judge, Villupuram.
2. The Court of the Sub Judge, Tindivanam
3. The V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.1720 of 1999
J.NISHA BANU, J.,
sts
Judgment made in S.A.No.1720 of 1999
Dated:
20.01.2022
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!