Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.Jeevanantham vs The Inspector Of Police
2022 Latest Caselaw 864 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 864 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2022

Madras High Court
P.Jeevanantham vs The Inspector Of Police on 20 January, 2022
                                                                                Crl.O.P.No.219 of 2022

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 20.01.2022

                                                         CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

                                                 Crl.O.P.No.219 of 2022
                                                and Crl.M.P.No.61 of 2022

                     P.Jeevanantham                                              ... Petitioner/A1

                                                           Vs.
                     1.The Inspector of Police,
                       Nangavalli Police Station,
                       Salem District.
                       Cr.No.97 of 2017

                     2.Thiru.Sivasamy,
                       Spl. Sub-Inspector of Police,
                       Nangavalli Police Station,
                       Salem District.                      ... Respondents/Defacto complainants

                     Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code
                     of Criminal Procedure, to quash the FIR in Cr.No.97 of 2017 dated
                     15.05.2017 on the file of the 1st respondent for the alleged offences u/s
                     4A(1a) r/w 4B Tamil Nadu Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement)
                     Act, 1959.
                                  For Petitioner        : Mr.V.Elangovan
                                  For Respondents       : Mr.E.Raj Thilak for R1
                                                          Additional Public Prosecutor


                     1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 Crl.O.P.No.219 of 2022

                                                          ORDER

The petitioner accused in Crime No.97 of 2017 for the alleged

offences under Sections 4A(1a) r/w 4B Tamil Nadu Open Places

(Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959, filed this quash petition.

2.The gist of the complaint is that on 15.05.2017 at about 5.45

p.m., the Special Sub-Inspector of Police attached to Nangavalli Police

Station along with the constable Sekar was keeping watch over the area at

that time near the Nangavalli Panchayat Middle School, they found a

handbill of Communist Party of India in size 29.5 cm in length and 21 cm

in breadth pasted on the compound of the School calling for a protest

against the Deputy Superintendent of Police on 16.05.2017. In the

poster, it was found that the protest was to be held by the petitioner.

Hence, a case has been registered against him.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

continuation of further proceedings is an abuse of process of law. He

would further submit that the offences alleged against the petitioner is

punishable for a maximum period of 6 months. Though the case has

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.219 of 2022

been registered on 15.05.2017, the Final Report has not been filed by the

respondent Police till date and that there is a specific bar under Section

468 of the Cr.P.C. for the Magistrate to take cognizance of the offence

beyond the period of limitation which is more than 4 years in this case.

In support of the above contention, he would rely on the judgments

reported in (1981) 3 SCC 34 : AIR 1981 SC 1054 (State of Punjab v.

Sarwan Singh) and reported in (1999) 4 SCC 690 (Arun Vyas v. Anitha

Vyas).

4.He further submits that in this case, the School Authorities have

not lodged any complaint and there is nothing to show that the

photograph of the handbill was seized and even mahazar prepared,

whether the handbills were printed and stuck by the petitioner, no

investigation has been done. Since it was a protest against the Deputy

Superintendent of Police, the Police got enraged and the petitioner shown

as accused. Showing protest is a hallmark of democracy which cannot be

curtailed by foisting of cases. Hence, having no other option except to file

this quash petition. Hence, the FIR initiated against the petitioner in

Crime No.97 of 2017 on the file of the first respondent, is prayed to be

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.219 of 2022

quashed.

5.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the

petitioner belonging to Communist Party of India to condemn the act of

the Deputy Superintendent of Police was planning to hold a protest on

16.05.2017, on 15.05.2017 they pasted handbills at various places, one

such handbill was pasted in the compound wall of the Panchayat Middle

School without the permission of the concerned, no handbill or poster to

be pasted in the public wall. He further submits that the investigation in

progress, soon Final Report to be filed, investigation cannot be short

circuited by filing the above quash petition, handbills in size 29.5 cm in

length and 21 cm in breadth pasted on the School compound wall calling

for a protest against the functioning of the Deputy Superintendent of

Police. Hence, strongly opposed the quash petition.

6.Admittedly, in this case no School Authorities lodged any

complaint against the petitioner, pasted handbills not recorded, by

photograph or observation mahazar, no handbill seized, further it is 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.219 of 2022

years since the case registered and the investigation is still pending.

7.Admittedly, these offences are punishable for a maximum period

of 6 months. The case has been registered on 15.05.2017 and till date,

the Final Report not filed. There is a specific bar under Section

468(1)(2)(c) Cr.P.C for taking cognizance after lapse of period of

limitation and the learned Judicial Magistrate is barred from taking

cognizance. No reason is assigned by the respondent Police to explain

the delay in filing the Final Report. In view of the same, the learned

Judicial Magistrate cannot take cognizance and there is no purpose in

keeping the First Information Report pending endlessly.

8.Considering the rival submissions and on perusal of the materials

it is seen that there was a handbill pasted on the compound wall of the

Panchayat Middle School wherein the petitioner called for a protest

against the functioning of the Deputy Superintendent of Police. Hence, it

is natural that protest to be held, showing protest is an fundamental right,

Hallmark of Democracy, further the concerned School Authorities not

lodged any complaint.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.219 of 2022

9.In view of the above, the First Information Report in Crime

No.97 of 2017, on the file of the first respondent Police, is quashed and

the Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.

20.01.2022

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order pam

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.219 of 2022

To

1.The Inspector of Police, Nangavalli Police Station, Salem District.

Crime No.97 of 2017

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.219 of 2022

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

pam

Crl.O.P.No.219 of 2022

20.01.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter