Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 661 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2022
T.C.A. No. 7 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.01.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Tax Case Appeal No. 7 of 2022
Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai. .. Appellant
Versus
Mysore Leathers P.Ltd
1 Kumarappa Street
Periamet
Chennai – 600 003 .. Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “C” Bench,
dated 26.06.2002 in I.TA.No.3254/Mds/92.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan
Senior Standing Counsel
Page 1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A. No. 7 of 2022
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)
This tax case appeal has been filed by the appellant / Revenue,
challenging the order dated 26.06.2002 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Bench 'C', Chennai, in I.T.A.No.3254/Mds/92, relating to the
assessment year 1988-89, by raising the following substantial questions of
law:-
“1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,
the Appellate Tribunal was right in upholding the order of the
CIT (A), which had been passed on the basis of fresh evidence
filed for the first time before him, without giving an opportunity
to the assessing officer?
2. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the
Appellate Tribunal was right in not remandig the matter to the
assessing officer, when the provisions of Sec.40A(2) specifies
that the opinion of the Assessing Officer is necessary for
gauging if an expenditure is excessive or unreasonable?"
3.When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
Page 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A. No. 7 of 2022
for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeal shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not
exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax
effect in this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4.In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is said
to be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn,
keeping open the substantial question of law for determination in an
appropriate case. No costs.
(R.M.D., J.) (M.S.Q., J.)
11.01.2022
dhk
Internet : Yes
Index : Yes / No
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and
Page 3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A. No. 7 of 2022
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
dhk
To
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai.
2.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “C” Bench.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Special Range -X, Madras – 600 034
4. The Commissioner of Incometax (Appeals) IX Chennai – 600 034
T.C.A.No.7 of 2022
11.01.2022
Page 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!