Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 580 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2022
Crl.O.P(MD)No.20626 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 10.01.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Crl.O.P(MD)No.20626 of 2021
and
Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.11730 and 17731 of 2021
V.Lakshmanan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
NIB CID,
Madurai District.
(Crime No.106 of 2013)
2.R.Madhan,
Inspector of Police,
NIB CID,
Madurai District. ... Respondents
Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the impugned charge sheet in
C.C.No.45 of 2016 on the file of the Additional Principal Special Court
for EC & NDPS Act Cases, Madurai and quash the same insofar as the
petitioner is concerned.
For Petitioner : Mr.AN.Ramanathan
For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar,
Addl. Public Prosecutor.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/6
Crl.O.P(MD)No.20626 of 2021
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents.
2.This criminal original petition has been filed to quash the
proceedings in C.C.No.45 of 2016 on the file of the Additional Principal
Special Court for EC & NDPS Act Cases, Madurai.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated all the
contentions set out in the memorandum of grounds. As rightly pointed
out by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents, in
view of the contentious nature of the facts involved, it is not open to this
Court to exercise its inherent powers in this case.
4.Leaving open the petitioner's defences and contentions, this
criminal original petition stands dismissed. However, taking note of the
fact that the prosecution is pending for more than five years, the learned
Trial Judge is directed to conclude the case on merits and in accordance
with law within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.20626 of 2021
of this order. Since the petitioner is employed as Haisldar, his personal
appearance before the Court below is dispensed with. However, the
Court below will insist on the personal appearance of the petitioner only
on three occasions namely, to answer the charge, for examination under
Section 313 of CrPC and at the time of pronouncing Judgment. On all
other occasions, the petitioner need not appear before the Court below.
However, on those occasions, the petitioner will have to be represented
by his counsel. If the petitioner's counsel is also absent, the benefit of
dispensing with the personal appearance of the petitioner will stand
automatically vacated. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions
are closed.
10.01.2022 Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ias
Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.20626 of 2021
To:
1.The Additional Principal Special Court for EC & NDPS Act Cases, Madurai.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, NIB CID, Madurai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.20626 of 2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.20626 of 2021
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
ias
Crl.O.P(MD)No.20626 of 2021
10.01.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!