Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 490 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2022
C.R.P.(MD) No.227 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 07.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
C.R.P(MD)No.227 of 2017
and
C.M.P(MD) No.1017 of 2017
1.J.Sharmila John
2.John Fernando ... Petitioners
Vs.
G.Maria Anthony Selvi ... Respondent
PRAYER:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of
Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order passed in
I.A.No.662 of 2016 in O.S.No.210 of 2016 dated 08.09.2016 on the file
of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin and allow this civil revision
petition.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Venkatesan
M/s.Right Law Associates
For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilipkumar
_________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.(MD) No.227 of 2017
ORDER
Challenging the order of attachment passed in I.A.No.662 of 2016
in O.S.No.210 of 2016 on the file of the Sub Court, Tuticorin, the
defendants have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227
of the Constitution of India, questioning the said order.
2.The respondent herein had filed the suit in O.S.No.210 of 2016
on the file of the Sub Court, Tuticorin, for recovery of a sum of
Rs.6,50,000/- together with interest at 9 % on the said sum from the date
of the suit till the date of realization. Along with the suit, the respondent
had filed IA No.662 of 2016 for an order of attachment before judgment,
failing which direct the petitioner herein to furnish the security to the
tune of suit claim.
3.In the affidavit filed in support of the said application, the
respondent herein had stated that the petition schedule property belongs
to the second petitioner, who is also liable to pay the respondent/plaintiff
and in order to deprive the respondent herein from enjoying the fruits of
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD) No.227 of 2017
the decree, they are taking steps to alienate the suit schedule property.
Therefore, the respondent had sought for direction to the revision
petitioner to furnish security, failing which, order of attachment before
the judgement of the property in question.
4.A detailed counter has been filed by the petitioners herein setting
up a counter claim of a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and also contending that the
respondent/plaintiff is in possession of the ground floor of the premises
and therefore, he is not entitled to claim interest on the loan amount.
5.The learned Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin, by order dated
08.09.2016 had ordered attachment.
6.It is informed by the learned counsel for the respondent that the
attachment order has also been effected. Therefore, without setting aside
the order in IA No.662 of 2016 and taking note of the fact that the
attachment order has been effected, this Civil Revision Petition is
disposed of with a direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin,
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD) No.227 of 2017
P.T.ASHA, J.
cp
to dispose of O.S.No.210 of of 2016 within a period of four months from
the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
07.01.2022
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No cp
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To:-
The Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin.
C.R.P(MD)No.227 of 2017 and C.M.P(MD) No.1017 of 2017
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!