Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 473 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2022
CRL.O.P.No.12834 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
CRL.O.P.No.12834 of 2021
B.M.Vadivelan ... Petitioner
Versus
1.The Inspector of Police,
C1, Bargur Police Station,
Krishnagiri District.
2.K.T.Anandan
3.Bharathi
4.Manimegalai
5.M.Sumathi ...Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
to direct the first respondent police to provide the protection to the
petitioner from the respondent Nos.2 to 5 to enter their agriculture land
situated in S.No.675/3B, Bargur Village & Taluk, Krishnagiri District.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.S.Mohankumar
For R1 : Mr.R.Vinothraja
Government Advocate
*****
Page No.1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.O.P.No.12834 of 2021
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the first
respondent police to provide the protection to the petitioner from the
respondent Nos.2 to 5 to enter their agriculture land situated in
S.No.675/3B, Bargur Village & Taluk, Krishnagiri District.
2.The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner had lodged a
complaint to the first respondent police on 09.07.2021, stating that the
petitioner is unable to enter into his property and carry on the agricultural
activities. He has been restrained by one K.T.Anandan
S/o.A.V.M.Thimmaraya Chetty, Bharathi W/o. Kamaraj, Manimegala
W/o. B.K.Chennaiyan and Sumathi W/o. Mahendran, on the premise that
the Late A.V.M.Thimmaraya Chetty had sold the property without the
concurrence of the legal heirs. The legal heirs have filed a suit in
A.S.No.728 of 1999 before this Court and this Court by Judgment dated
03.02.2020 had found that it was not a joint family property and the
obstructors have no right.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No.12834 of 2021
3.He further submitted that the patta has been issued in the name
of the petitioner and the copy of the patta is also produced. The petitioner
has produced the copy of the civil Court order and also the revenue
records to the first respondent. Despite the same, the first respondent
have not taken any action. Hence the present petition is filed.
4.The learned Government Advocate submits that the first
respondent after conducting enquiry and based on the High Court order
and Revenue records will provide necessary protection to the petitioner,
unless there is any other prohibitory order from the competent court.
5.Considering the submissions and on perusal of the materials, this
Court directs the first respondent police to provide necessary protection to
the petitioner based on this Court order dated 03.02.2020 in A.S.No.728
of 1999.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No.12834 of 2021
6.With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition
stands disposed of.
07.01.2022 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ah
To
1.The Inspector of Police, C1, Bargur Police Station, Krishnagiri District.
2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No.12834 of 2021
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
ah
CRL.O.P.No.12834 of 2021
07.01.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!