Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 374 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2022
Crl.O.P(MD)No.172 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 06.01.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Crl.O.P(MD)No.172 of 2022
Manikandan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Inspector of Police,
Allinagaram Police Station,
Theni.
2.Priya ... Respondents
Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C., to quash the charge sheet pending against the petitioner/accused
in C.C.No.113 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate
(Additional Mahila, Magistrate Level), Theni.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sevugaraja
For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar,
Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1.
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the first respondent.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.172 of 2022
2.The petitioner is facing trial in C.C.No.113 of 2019 on the file of
the Additional Mahila Court (Magisterial Level), Theni, for the offences
under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamilnadu
Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated all the
contentions set out in the memorandum of grounds. His first contention
is that the petitioner was very much working in his employer's factory,
when the occurrence is said to have taken place. This plea of alibi is
purely factual and it has to be established before the trial Court. His
second contention is that the petitioner is having certain psychotic issues.
If that be so, materials to that effect can certainly be placed before the
Court below and the Court below, I am sure would take note of the same.
4.With these observations, this criminal petition is dismissed.
However, taking note of the overall facts and circumstances, the personal
appearance of the petitioner before the Court below is dispensed with.
However, the Court below will insist on the personal appearance of the
petitioner only on three occasions namely, to answer the charge, for
examination under Section 313 of CrPC and at the time of pronouncing
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.172 of 2022
Judgment. On all other occasions, the petitioner need not appear before
the Court below. However, on those occasions, the petitioner will have
to be represented by his counsel. If the petitioner's counsel is also
absent, the benefit of dispensing with the personal appearance of the
petitioner will stand automatically vacated.
06.01.2022
Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ias
Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To:
1.The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court (Magisterial Level), Theni.
2.The Inspector of Police, Allinagaram Police Station, Theni.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.172 of 2022
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
ias
Crl.O.P(MD)No.172 of 2022
06.01.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!