Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahadevi (Died) vs N.Ramraj
2022 Latest Caselaw 1475 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1475 Mad
Judgement Date : 31 January, 2022

Madras High Court
Mahadevi (Died) vs N.Ramraj on 31 January, 2022
                                                                          C.R.P.(MD)No.663 of 2017



                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED: 31.01.2022

                                                    CORAM:

                                    THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

                                            C.R.P.(MD)No.663 of 2017
                                                      and
                                           C.M.P(MD) No.3000 of 2017

                     1.Mahadevi (died)

                     2.A.Ganesh Babu                                        ... Petitioners

                     (Memo dated 12.12.2021 (filed on 13.02.2021)
                     in USR No.28/162 is recorded as 1st petitioner
                     died and second petitioner and respondents 3 to 6
                     who are already on record, are recorded as LRs of
                     the deceased 1st petitioner vide Court order dated
                      17.12.2021 made in CRP(MD) No.663 of 2017)

                                                     -vs-

                     1.N.Ramraj
                     2.Sokkupapa
                     3.A.Usharani
                     4.A.Sujatha
                     5.A.Jeyam
                     6.A.Dhanapriya
                     7.M.Mayamani @ Senthilkumar                           ... Respondents



                     _________
                     Page 1 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                    C.R.P.(MD)No.663 of 2017



                     Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to

                     allow this civil revision petition thereby to set aside the fair order and

                     decreetal order dated 30.11.2016 made in I.A.No.511 of 2016 in O.S.No.

                     45 of 1984            on the file of learned Additional District Munsif,

                     Aruppukottai.

                                          For Petitioner     : Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj

                                          For R1             : Mr.S.Parthasarathy

                                          For R2, R4, R5     : No appearance

                                          For R3, R6 & R7    : Dismissed.


                                                            ORDER

The respondent 5 and 10, who are the legal representative of the

second plaintiff, are before this Court challenging the order passed in IA

No.511 of 2016 in OS No.45 of 1984 on the file of the learned Additional

District Munsif, Aruppukottai.

2.The suit in O.S.No.45 of 1984 was filed by one Narayanasamy

Reddiyar and his son Azhagarsamy Reddiyar, the husband of the first

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD)No.663 of 2017

petitioner and the father of the second petitioner and the respondents 3 to

6 herein. The suit was filed against one Ramraj, the son of the first

plaintiff for partition of the 2/3rd share of the plaintiff to the suit schedule

property. The suit was decreed by judgment and decree dated

18.10.1985. Thereafter, the defendant had filed final decree proceedings

in I.A.No.370 of 2010, which is subsequently re-numbered as IA No.511

of 2016. The learned Additional District Munsif, Aruppukottai, by order,

dated 30.11.2016, was pleased to appoint an advocate commissioner to

divide the property by metes and bounds and grant 5/12 th share to the

petitioner. The reason for the enhanced share was on account of the fact

that the father Narayanasamy Reddiyar had died and the defendants

would be equally entitled to the 1/3rd share of the said Narayanasamy

Reddiyar along with the second plaintiff and the other respondents. This

order is challenged by the legal representatives of the second plaintiff on

the ground that the Court below had not taken note of the Will, Ex.R55

dated 21.02.1985, in and by which, the share of the first plaintiff's father

had been bequeathed to the second petitioner herein.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD)No.663 of 2017

3.The revision petitioners would contend that the judgment and

decree in OS No.45 of 1984 was challenged before this Court in AS No.

104 of 1986 wherein the Will was brought to the notice of the Court and

the Division Bench of this Court had directed that the rights accruing to

Narayanasamy Reddiyar, the first plaintiff, had to be worked out in the

final decree proceedings. Despite such an order, the same has not been

considered by the learned Additional District Munsif, Aruppukottai.

Therefore, the order has to be set aside.

4.After hearing both the counsel, it was evident that the dispute

was only with reference to 1/3rd share of the first plaintiff, Narayanasamy

Reddiyar, as to whether the second plaintiff would be entitled to the

share of Narayanasamy Reddiyar by virtue of the Will marked as Ex.R55

or whether it has to be treated that the Narayanasamy Reddiyar had died

intestate and therefore, his 1/3rd, share had to be shared equally amongst

all these legal heirs, as a result of which, the first respondent herein

would be entitled to 5/12th share as held by the learned Additional

District Munsif, Arupukottai in the final decree. Therefore, a suggestion

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD)No.663 of 2017

has been made by this Court that the final decree proceedings would be

confirmed with reference to 1/3rd share of the defendants as well as the

legal representatives 1/3rd share each to the first respondent herein and

the legal representative of the second plaintiff and as regards, the 1/3rd

share of the first plaintiff Narayanasamy Reddiyar, the same shall be

remitted back to the learned Additional District Munsif, Aruppukottai for

fresh consideration on the basis of Ex.R.55, Will which has to be proved

by the revision petitioners herein in the manner known to law.

5.Both the counsel have agreed to this suggestion. Accordingly,

this Civil Revision Petition is partly allowed with a direction to the

advocate commissioner to measure and partition the properties by metes

and bounds and grant 1/3rd share to the first respondent. With reference

to the 1/3rd share of the father, IA No.511 of 2010 is remitted back to the

learned Additional District Munsif, Aruppukottai to be considered afresh

in the light of the will, Ex.R55, which shall be proved in the manner

known to law by the revision petitioner herein. The share of the first

plaintiff shall be thereafter re-worked, if the Will is found against the

petitioners herein.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD)No.663 of 2017

6.With the above observations, this civil revision petition is partly

allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is

closed.

31.01.2022

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No cp

Note:-

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To

TheAdditional District Munsif, Aruppukottai.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD)No.663 of 2017

P.T.ASHA, J.

cp

C.R.P.(MD)No.663 of 2017 and C.M.P(MD) No.3000 of 2017

Dated: 31.01.2022

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter