Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1378 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2022
W.P.No.1088 of 2022
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated: 28.01.2022
Coram
The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P.No.1088 of 2022
C.Sugumaran
.... Petitioner
Vs.
The Managing Director,
Metropolitan Transport Corporation,
Pallavan House, Chennai – 600 002.
.... Respondent
PETITION filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to
consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.10.2021 and thereby
direct the respondent to give salary to the petitioner for the period of
March, 2014 to September, 2014.
For Petitioner : Mr. N.Palanisamy
For Respondent: Mr.K.Moorthy
Standing Counsel
--------------
ORDER
The case of the petitioner is that he was working as Driver in the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.1088 of 2022
respondent Corporation. On 23.02.2014 while driving the Metropolitan
Transport Corporation bus bearing registration No.TN 01 N 8290, he was
involved in an accident and a case was registered under Section 279 and
338 of I.P.C. on the file of T12 Poonamallee Traffic Investigation Wing.
2. According to the petitioner, the Investigation Wing had forcibly
seized his licence and impounded the same. Thereafter, he was not
provided with any work for a period of six months from April, 2014 to
September, 2014. Thereafter, a charge sheet was filed in C.C.No.345 of
2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur. Finally, the
petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case vide judgment dated
28.03.2017.
3. According to the petitioner, he had approached the respondent
Corporation for payment of salary for the period April, 2014 to
September, 2014 and the same having not been considered, he is before
this Court with a prayer for issuance of Writ of Mandamus.
4. Apart from the above facts, nothing has been stated in specific
terms as to why he was not allowed to perform duty between April, 2014
to September, 2014. There is also no explanation at all in the entire
affidavit why the petitioner is approaching this Court in 2022 after a lapse
of 8 years. Even giving the benefit of doubt that he was waiting for the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.1088 of 2022
outcome of the criminal case initiated against him, the criminal case
ended in acquittal as early as on 28.03.2017. Even thereafter, nearly 5
years have gone by, the affidavit also does not disclose as to how he is
entitled to the payments in the first place.
5. This Court is unable to countenance the case of the petitioner,
both on merits and also on the ground that the claim is extremely stale and
hopelessly time barred.
6. For the above stated reasons, this Writ Petition stands dismissed.
No costs.
28.01.2022
Index: Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order sl
To
The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Pallavan House, Chennai – 600 002.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.1088 of 2022
V.PARTHIBAN,J.
Sl
W.P.No.1088 of 2022
28.01.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!