Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1298 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2022
Crl.O.P(MD)No.1357 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.01.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Crl.O.P(MD)No.1357 of 2022
and
Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.1013 and 1015 of 2022
Periyasamy ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Inspector of Police,
Manamadurai Police Station,
Manamadurai,
Sivagangai District.
(In Crime No.760 of 2020)
2.Selvi ... Respondents
Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C., to call for the records and to quash the C.C.No.112 of 2021 on
the file of the Additional District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate,
Manamadurai, Sivagangai District and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajaram
For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar,
Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
Crl.O.P(MD)No.1357 of 2022
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the first respondent.
2.This criminal original petition has been field to quash the
impugned proceedings in C.C.No.112 of 2021 on the file of the
Additional District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai,
Sivagangai District. The petitioner is facing trial for the offences under
Sections 448 and 294(b) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition
of Harassment of Women Act.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated all the
contentions set out in the memorandum of grounds. He would contend
that the impugned prosecution is a counter blast to the complaint given
by the petitioner herein. Though the contentions of the petitioner's
counsel are persuasive, since the facts are contentious in nature, I am not
in a position to invoke the power under Section 482 of CrPC.
4.Leaving open all the defences and contentions of the petitioner,
this criminal original petition is dismissed. However, taking note of the
overall facts and circumstances, the personal appearance of the petitioner
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.1357 of 2022
before the Court below is dispensed with. However, the Court below will
insist on the personal appearance of the petitioner only on three
occasions namely, to answer the charge, for examination under Section
313 of CrPC and at the time of pronouncing Judgment. On all other
occasions, the petitioner need not appear before the Court below.
However, on those occasions, the petitioner will have to be represented
by his counsel. If the petitioner's counsel is also absent, the benefit of
dispensing with the personal appearance of the petitioner will stand
automatically vacated. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions
are closed.
27.01.2022 Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ias Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To:
1.Additional District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Manamadurai Police Station, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.1357 of 2022
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
ias
Crl.O.P(MD)No.1357 of 2022
27.01.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!