Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Management vs The Presiding Officer
2022 Latest Caselaw 120 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 120 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2022

Madras High Court
The Management vs The Presiding Officer on 4 January, 2022
                                                            1

                                  BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED: 04.01.2022

                                                         CORAM:

                        THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                              AND
                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

                                             W.A(MD)NO.1851 OF 2021
                                                       and
                                             C.M.P(MD)No.8067 of 2021


                     The Management,
                     Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
                     (Madurai Division) Limited,
                     By-Pass Road,
                     Madurai.                                        :Appellant/Petitioner


                                                 .vs.


                     1.The Presiding Officer,
                       Labour Court,
                       Madurai.                          :Ist Respondent/Ist Respondent

                     2.S.Muthuraja                       :2nd Respondent/2nd Respondent


                     PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                     praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in
                     W.P(MD)No.10280 of 2013, dated 04.11.2019


                                      For Appellant             :Mr.J.Senthil Kumariah

                                      For Respondent-2          :Mr.A.Rajaram




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                            2

                                                   JUDGMENT

*********

[Judgment of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.]

This Writ Appeal is directed against the order of this Court

made in W.P(MD)No.10280 of 2013, dated 04.11.2019.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and

perused the materials placed before this Court.

3.The matter was originally referred to the Tamil Nadu

Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court, for reaching an

amicable settlement between the parties. The Mediation seems to

be successful and a Settlement Agreement was arrived at between

the parties, which was reduced into writing by way of a Settlement

Agreement, dated 15.12.2021. Both the parties have agreed to the

terms of the Settlement Agreement and accordingly, both the

parties as well as their respective counsels have duly signed in the

Settlement Agreement and the terms of the Settlement Agreement

reads as under:

''1.Disputes and differences had arisen between the parties hereto and W.A.No.1851 of 2021 was filed on 02.09.2021 before the Honourable Division Bench.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2.The matter was referred to Mediation/Conciliation vide an order dated 27.09.2021 passed by the Honourable Chief Justice and the Honourable Mr.Justice M.Duraisamy.

3.The parties agreed that Mr.J.Alaguram Jothi would act as their Mediator/Conciliator.

4.Several meetings were held during the process of Mediation/Conciliation from 21.10.2021 to 25.12.2021 and the parties have with the assistance of the Mediator/Conciliator voluntarily arrived at an amicable solution resolving the above mentioned disputes and differences.

5.The parties hereto confirm and declare that they have voluntarily and of their own free will arrived at this Settlement Agreement in the presence of the Mediator.

6.The following settlement has been arrived at between the Parties hereto:-

1.In the meeting held on 29.10.2021, the second respondent has given a written representation to reinstate him without back wages without affecting him continuity of service. The employer contribution towards Pension Trust has agreed to be deducted.

2.By a letter dated 8.11.2021, the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Assistant Manager(MCOP) was authorized by the Managing Director to represent the matter before the Mediation.

3.According the Assitant Manager had taken the matter to be placed before your Board for approval of the request made by the second respondent.

4.On 10.12.2021, the Assistant Manager has proved the board Resolution No.126, dated 17.11.2021 accepting the above offer and whereby agreeing to reinstate the second respondent without backwages with continuity of service excluding the period from 22.02.2003 to 04.04.2008. The Management is agreeable to implement the Board Resolution which is attached herewith.

7.By signing this Agreement the parties hereto state that they have no further claims or demands against each other with respect to I.D.No. 8/2011(Case No.) and all disputes and differences in this regard have been amicably settled by the parties hereto through the process of Conciliation/Mediation.''

The learned counsels appearing on either side have agreed for

recording the above Settlement Agreement entered between the

parties. The said Setltement Agreement is recorded.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4.In view of the above, the Writ Appeal stands disposed of in

terms of the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement

shall form part and parcel of the decree.No costs.Consequently

connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

                                                                    [P.S.N.,J.]    [P.V.,J.]
                                                                          04.01.2022
                     Index:Yes/No
                     Internet:Yes/No
                     vsn

                     Note :

                     In view of the present lock
                     down owing to COVID-19
                     pandemic, a web copy of
                     the order may be utilized
                     for official purposes, but,
                     ensuring that the copy of
                     the order that is presented
                     is the correct copy, shall
                     be the responsibility of the
                     advocate       /     litigant
                     concerned.


                     To

                     The Presiding Officer,
                     Labour Court,
                     Madurai.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

AND P.VELMURUGAN, J.

vsn

JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)NO.1851 OF 2021 and C.M.P(MD)No.8067 of 2021

04.01.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter