Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Paul Thiraviyam vs Ramiah
2022 Latest Caselaw 1059 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1059 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 January, 2022

Madras High Court
Paul Thiraviyam vs Ramiah on 24 January, 2022
                                                                       C.R.P.(MD) No.1733 of 2017

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   DATED: 24.01.2022

                                                      CORAM :

                                     THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

                                              C.R.P.(MD) No.1733 of 2017
                                                         and
                                              C.M.P.(MD) No.9422 of 2017

                Paul Thiraviyam                                              ... Petitioner

                                                         vs.
                1.Ramiah

                2.Esakkiyappa

                3.Maasaanam

                4.Nanguneri Taluk, Kalakadu Via, Pathai,
                  Perumal Sannathi Street,
                  Vasutheva Perumal Kovil through its Agthaar
                  Dharmaraj Iyer,
                  S/o.Venkateswaran
                  now residing at
                  Perumal Kovil Street,
                  Sehncottah, Tirunelveli District.                          ... Respondents

                PRAYER:- This Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,
                to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.683 of 2017 in O.S.No.
                158 of 2007 dated 01.08.2017 on the file of the Additional District Munsif
                Court, Nanguneri.

                                  For Petitioner   : Mr.R.T.Arivukumar for
                                                         Mr.N.GA.Natraj

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                1/9
                                                                      C.R.P.(MD) No.1733 of 2017



                                                        ORDER

The plaintiff, who is the revision petitioner before this Court, is

challenging the dismissal of the application seeking reissue of the warrant to the

Advocate Commissioner to inspect the petition premises with the assistance of

the Taluk Surveyor, measure the suit properties and submit a detailed report

with measurements.

2.The short facts are as follows:-

3.The plaintiff had filed a suit O.S.No.158 of 2007 on the file of the

learned Additional District Munsif, Nanguneri for mandatory injunction and for

permanent injunction. The said suit was dismissed by judgment dated

12.03.2008 on the ground that the petitioner herein has not sought for the

appointment of a Surveyor to assist the Advocate Commissioner and therefore,

the petitioner was not entitled to the decree as claimed for. This non-speaking

order was taken up on appeal by the plaintiff in A.S.No.107 of 2008. In the said

appeal, the Advocate Commissioner was appointed by order in I.A.No.193 of

2011, who had submitted his report. Thereafter, the plaintiff had once again

filed I.A.No.7 of 2012 in I.A.No.193 of 2011 in A.S.No.107 of 2008 for a

direction to the Advocate Commissioner to measure the suit properties with the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(MD) No.1733 of 2017

assistance of FMB sketch that has been filed by the petitioner/plaintiff. This

petition came to be allowed by order dated 12.09.2013. The learned Subordinate

Judge, Valliyoor had directed the Advocate Commissioner to take the assistance

of the Taluk Surveyor and submit a detailed report with the help of FMB

records submitted by the petitioner. Thereafter, A.S.No.107 of 2008 was

remitted back to the trial Court for fresh consideration. The report of the

Advocate Commissioner in I.A.No.193 of 2011 was directed to be forwarded to

the trial Court and directions were issued to the trial Court to consider this

report and pass orders. After remand, the petitioner/plaintiff has come forward

with the impugned application for the following reliefs:-

“,j;Jld; ,izj;Js;s mgpltpl;;by; fz;l fhuzq;fshy; fdk; Nfhh;l;lhh; mth;fs; fpUig nra;J kD jgrpy; nrhj;Jf;fis fpuhk tiuglk; kw;Wk; ej;jk; epytupjpl;lj;jpd;gb kPz;Lk; ghh;itapl;L mwpf;if jhf;fy; nra;a VJthf t.k.vz;.193/2011-y; epakpf;fg;gl;l mNj tof;fwpQiu (,yq;Nfhghyd;) Mizauhf epakpj;J mtUf;F cjtpahf jhYfh rh;Ntaiu epakdk; nra;J mth; %yk; kD jgrpy; nrhj;Jf;fis mstPL nra;J é];jpfis Fwpj;J msTfs; rfpjk; tiuglj;Jld; xU tpupthd mwpf;if jhf;fy; nra;a cj;jutplNtz;b kDjhu;/thjp tzf;fkha;

gpuhh;j;jpf;fpwhh;”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(MD) No.1733 of 2017

4.This petition has been dismissed by the learned Judge, against which

the present revision has been filed. The learned Judge has observed the conduct

of the petitioner in not proceeding with the trial, while dismissing the said

petition. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner is before this Court.

5.Heard the learned counsels on either side.

6.The first appellate Court in its judgment in A.S.No.107 of 2008 had

remitted the matter with the following directions:-

“3.mry; tof;fhdJ kPz;Lk; tprhuiz ePjpkd;wj;jpw;F kPl;lDg;Gif nra;ag;gl;L tprhuiz ePjpkd;wk; 1 Kjy; 3 gpujpthjpfSf;F vjph; tof;Fiu jhf;fy; nra;a Nghjpa fhy mtfhrk; toq;fpAk; gpd;dh; cgajug;gpdh;fs; jug;gpy; Kd;epWj;jg;gLk; tha;nkhop kw;Wk; Mtz rhl;rpaq;fis ed;F guprPyid nra;J ,e;j Nky;KiwaPl;L tof;fpy; tof;fpil kD vz;.193/2011y; jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;Ls;s Mizau; mwp;f;if kw;Wk; tiuglj;ifAk; Ma;tpw;F vLj;Jf;nfhz;L jFjpapd; mbg;gilapy; mry; tof;if jPh;khdpf;f Ntz;Lk; vd;W Mizaplg;gLfpwJ.

4.,e;j tof;fpy; tof;fpil kD vz.193/2011y; jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;l Mizau; mwp;f;if kw;Wk; tiuglj;ij tprhuiz ePjpkd;wj;jpw;F mDg;gp itf;f cj;jutplg;gLfpwJ.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(MD) No.1733 of 2017

7.Therefore, while remitting the matter, the appellate Judge had clearly

stated that the trial Court should refer to the Advocate Commissioner's report as

given in I.A.No.193 of 2011. The petitioner has thereafter taken out this

application, that too after the matter had been adjourned on several occasions

for enquiry. The learned Judge has set out the conduct of the petitioner as

follows:-

“A.S. 107/08y; Mizau; mwp;f;if kw;Wk; tiuglkhdJ 28.03.2016 md;W ePjpkd;wj;jpy; jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;bUg;gJ njupa tUfpwJ. ,e;j Mizah; mwpf;ifia vjph;j;J ,e;j kDjhuh; Nky;KiwaPl;L tof;fpy; Ml;Nrgid Fwpg;ghiz vijAk; jhf;fy; nra;atpy;iy vd;gJk; ,JNghd;w kD vijAk; jhf;fy; nra;atpy;iy vd;gJk; njupa tUfpwJ.

mry; tof;F ,e;j ePjpkd;wj;jpw;f;F kPl;lDg;Gif nra;ag;gl;l gpd;G 15.06.2016ypUe;J ,e;j ePjpkd;wj;jpy; epYitapy; ,Ug;gJk; 21.11.2016 md;W tof;F tprhuizf;fhf tha;jh Nghlgl;bUg;gJk; md;iwa jpdj;jpy; ,e;j kDjhh; jug;gpy; fl;lis 6 tpjp 17d; fPo; kD jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;L me;j kD tprhuiz eilngw;wpUg;gJk; kPz;Lk; ,e;j kDjhh; jug;gpy; thRNjth; ngUkhs; Nfhtpypy; mf;jhiu xU jug;ghf Nru;f;f Nfhhp 14.12.2016y; kD jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;L me;j kDtpd; kPJ tprhuiz eilngw;W mJ mDkjpf;fg;gl;l gpd;G kPz;Lk; rPu;jpUj;jy; kD jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;L mDkjpf;fg;gl;bUg;gJk; mjd; mbg;gilapy; $Ljy; vjpUiu jhf;fy; nra;a tha;jh Nghlg;gl;L kPz;Lk; tof;F tprhuizf;fhf 12.06.2017 md;W tha;jh Nghlg;gl;bUg;gJ njupa tUfpwJ.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(MD) No.1733 of 2017

12.06.2017ypUe;J tof;F tprhuizf;fhf 15.06.2017 19.06.2017 kw;Wk; 21.06.2017 tha;jh Nghlg;gl;bUg;gJk; 21.06.2017 md;W kDjhh; ,e;j kDit jhf;fy; nra;jpUg;gJk; njhpa tUfpwJ. Nky;KiwaPl;L ePjpkd;wj;jpy; jhf;fy; nra;j Mizah; mwpf;ifapy; FiwghL ,Ug;gJ kDjhUf;F njupe;jpUf;Fk; epiyapy; mry; tof;F ,e;j ePjpkd;wj;jpw;F kPl;lDg;Gif nra;ag;gl;l mjhtJ 1 Mz;L fhykhf ,e;j kDtpid kDjhh; jug;gpy; jhf;fy; nra;atpy;iy vd;gJ njhpa tUfpwJ.”

8.Before the appellate Court, the petitioner had taken out an application

I.A.No.7 of 2012 in I.A.No.193 of 2011 in A.S.No.107 of 2008, wherein the

petitioner/plaintiff had sought for a direction to the Advocate Commissioner to

measure the suit property as per the FMB sketch provided by the plaintiff. The

Advocate Commissioner had originally filed a report in I.A.No.193 of 2011.

Thereafter, the petitioner had filed an interlocutory application in this I.A.No.

193 of 2011 and that petition was also ordered. Now, after the remand, the

applicant has come forward with the instant application and the only reason for

seeking the reissue is to direct the Advocate Commissioner to refer to the

village map. Already there are two reports on file and the remand is only to

consider the report in I.A.No.193 of 2011 and also the subsequent report in the

said interlocutory application. The petitioner cannot expand the scope of the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(MD) No.1733 of 2017

remand by seeking fresh directions to the Advocate Commissioner. That apart,

the finding of the Court below regarding the conduct of the petitioner in

protracting the suit has also got to be taken note of.

9.In these circumstances, I do not see any reason to reappreciate the order

passed by the learned Additional District Munsif, Nanguneri. Consequently, the

Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.

                Index             : Yes / No                                       24.01.2022
                Internet          : Yes / No
                mm

                To

                The Additional District Judge,
                Nanguneri.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                                    C.R.P.(MD) No.1733 of 2017




                                               P.T.ASHA, J.

                                                          mm




                                  C.R.P.(MD) No.1733 of 2017




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                                  C.R.P.(MD) No.1733 of 2017

                                                 24.01.2022




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter