Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Parasuram vs Mohamed Jaleel
2022 Latest Caselaw 2010 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2010 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2022

Madras High Court
M.Parasuram vs Mohamed Jaleel on 8 February, 2022
                                                                           C.R.P.(NPD).No.284 of 2022




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 08.02.2022

                                                     CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

                                            C.R.P.(NPD).No.284 of 2022
                                                      and
                                              C.M.P.No.1362 of 2022


                     M.Parasuram                ...Petitioner/Defendant/Revision Petitioner

                                                         -Vs-

                     Mohamed Jaleel             ...Respondent/Plaintiff/Respondent


                     Prayer:       Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil
                     Procedure against the order dated 02.12.2021 passed in I.A.N.3 of
                     2020 in O.S.No.34 of 2015 on the file of the learned Subordinate
                     Judge, Uthangarai.


                                    For Petitioner    : Ms.AL.Ganthimathi




                     1/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              C.R.P.(NPD).No.284 of 2022




                                                          ORDER

The defendant is the revision petitioner. Aggrieved by the

dismissal of his application to condone the delay of 1929 days in

setting aside the ex parte decree he is before this Court.

2.The brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this Civil

Revision Petition are as follows:

The plaintiff/respondent has filed the suit O.S.No.34 of 2015 on

the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai, seeking a

decree for Specific Performance. It is the case of the plaintiff that on

28.03.2013, an Agreement was entered into between the defendant

and the plaintiff in and by which the defendant/revision petitioner

herein had undertaken to sell the suit schedule property for a total sale

consideration of Rs.3,10,000/-. On the date of Agreement of Sale, the

plaintiff had paid a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- as advance and the balance

of Rs.10,000/- was payable within two years from the date of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(NPD).No.284 of 2022

Agreement. The plaintiff would state that he is always ready and

willing to perform his part of contract. However, the defendant did

not come forward to execute the Sale Deed, constraining the plaintiff

to issue a Legal Notice dated 01.02.2015 calling upon the defendants

to execute the Sale Deed.

3.Though, summons were served on the defendants, the

defendants did not enter appearance. Consequently, by Judgment and

Decree dated 10.07.2015, the suit was decreed as ex parte.

4.Thereafter, the plaintiff had filed REP No.17 of 2016 on the

file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai, for executing the

Decree by issuing directions to the defendants to execute and to

register a Sale Deed, failing which, the respondent/plaintiff had

sought for a direction that the Court should execute the Sale Deed in

his favour.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(NPD).No.284 of 2022

5.Thereafter, the petitioner had filed the impugned petition for

condoning the delay of 1929 days in filing of the petition for setting

aside the ex parte decree. In the affidavit filed in support of the

petition to condone the delay, the revision petitioner would contend

that he has received summons, however, since he is a Driver by

profession he was frequently away from his place. In these

circumstances, he was not able to engage a Counsel. However, the

plaintiff had assured him that he would not execute the Decree. This

commitment was given in a Panchayat organised for resolving the

dispute between him and the respondent/plaintiff. Thereafter, on

02.04.2016, he has received summons from the execution Court even

at that time negotiations for settling the matter was undertaken. The

respondent had assured that he would withdraw the suit. Believing

the words, the revision petitioner had not prosecuted the execution

petition also. Therefore, in these given circumstances, the delay had

occurred.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(NPD).No.284 of 2022

6.The plaintiff had filed a detailed counter inter alia contending

that it is nothing but an attempt to protract the proceedings. The

respondent had denied the allegations of settlement/withdrawing the

case. The learned Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai, by his order dated

02.12.2021, was pleased to dismiss the said application. The learned

Judge had observed that the reasons set out by the petitioner in his

affidavit filed in support of the petition has not been proved by him in

the manner known to Law and considering the fact that the delay is

for over five years and nine months, the petition is liable to be

dismissed. Challenging this application, the defendant is before this

Court.

7.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the

papers.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(NPD).No.284 of 2022

8.The only two reasons given for not participating in the suit is

that :

(a)The petitioner is a Driver by profession and therefore, he is

traveling outside regularly and

(b)After receipt of the notice, the plaintiff had assured that he

would settle the matter and that he had no intention of proceedings

with the suit. The same reason is given for not participating in the

execution petition.

9.It is seen that the petitioner had received summons in the suit

on 06.07.2015. He has not bothered to follow up the case thereafter,

till he received the summons in the execution petition on 02.04.2016.

Even after that, the petitioner has not immediately taken steps to file

the application to set aside the ex parte order. The impugned petition

has been filed only on 18.11.2020, nearly four years after the receipt

of the notice in the execution proceedings and five years and nine

months after the ex parte decree. The reason given is that the plaintiff

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(NPD).No.284 of 2022

had assured the revision petitioner that they would settle the issue.

These talks are claimed to have been held in the presence of

mediators, however, the petitioner has not thought it fit to examine

any one of these mediators to prove his case. Therefore, the reason

given are not only insufficient but are also not corroborated with

evidence. I do not find any reason as to why the order of the learned

Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai, has to be set aside and accordingly,

the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. No Costs.

Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.



                                                                                         08.02.2022

                     Internet   : Yes/No
                     Index      :Yes/No
                     Speaking / Non-Speaking
                     mps

                     To

                     The Subordinate Judge,
                     Uthangarai.








https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                           C.R.P.(NPD).No.284 of 2022


                                                 P.T. ASHA, J,


                                                               mps




                                  C.R.P.(NPD).No.284 of 2022
                                                         and
                                       C.M.P.No.1362 of 2022




                                                      08.02.2022








https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter