Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Muthupandian vs The District Registrar
2022 Latest Caselaw 18294 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 18294 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2022

Madras High Court
Muthupandian vs The District Registrar on 23 December, 2022
                                                           1        W.P.(MD)NO.21895 OF 2021

                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED: 23.12.2022

                                                     CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                                          W.P.(MD)No.21895 of 2021

                     Muthupandian                                        ... Petitioner
                                                         Vs.

                     1. The District Registrar,
                        O/o.The District Registrar Office,
                        Tenkasi, Tenkasi District.

                     2. The Sub Registrar,
                        Sub Registrar Office,
                        Melaneelithanallur,
                        Sankarankovil Taluk,
                        Tenkasi District.

                     3. V.Pown Pandian

                     4. M.Mahalakshmi
                         (R-3 & R-4 are impleaded vide order dated 24.01.2022
                          in W.M.P.(MD)No.19600 of 2021)                  ... Respondents

                                  Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the
                     Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified
                     Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent's reply
                     dated 27.10.2021 in Na.Ka.No.6998/AA/2021 relating to the
                     unilateral      cancellation   of    the   settlement     deed       dated
                     03.10.2012 registered as Document No.2314/2012 in the 2nd
                     respondent and to quash the same as illegal and consequently
                     direct the 2nd respondent to delete the entries of the


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/12
                                                            2        W.P.(MD)NO.21895 OF 2021

                     cancellation of Settlement deed dated 03.10.2012 registered
                     as Document No.2314/2012 in the 2nd Respondent.


                                  For Petitioner    : Mr.V.Muthuvelan


                                  For R-1 & R-2     : Mr.N.Sathees Kumar,
                                                      Additional Government Pleader.

                                  For R-3 & R-4     : No appearance.

                                                       ***

                                                    ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ

petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader

appearing for the official respondents.

2. Though the fourth respondent has been served and

her name is also entered in the cause list, she has not chosen

to enter appearance. Notice sent to the third respondent was

returned as “unclaimed.

3. The petitioner's father Thiru.Veliyappathevar

executed a settlement deed dated 26.08.2002 in favour of the

writ petitioner. It was registered as document No.2186 of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3 W.P.(MD)NO.21895 OF 2021

2002 on the file of the second respondent. Ten years later, the

said deed was unilaterally cancelled vide document No.2314

of 2012 dated 01.10.2012. The petitioner came to know about

the same only recently. Thereafter, the present writ petition

has been filed.

4. The petitioner's father passed away in the

meanwhile. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

categorically asserts that till date the property has not

changed hands. The said submission made by the petitioner

through his counsel is placed on record.

5. It is beyond dispute that the issue raised in this

writ petition is no longer res integra. The Hon'ble Full Bench

of this Court in the decision reported in 2022 (5) CTC 257

( Sasikala V. Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-Sub

Collector) has held as follows:-

“ 40.Hence, we have no hesitation to

answer the issue by holding that the

Sub-Registrar namely, the Registering

Authority has no power to accept the Deed of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4 W.P.(MD)NO.21895 OF 2021

Cancellation to nullify the Deed of Conveyance

made earlier.

41.Regarding Gift or Settlement: With

regard to unilateral cancellation of gift deed,

which is not revokable and does not come

under the purview of Section 126 of the

Transfer of Property Act, the Registrar has no

power to accept the Deed of Cancellation to

nullify the registered Settlement Deed.

Section 126 of the Transfer of Property Act,

reads as follows:

“126. When Gift may be suspended or

revoked.—The Donor and Donee may agree

that on the happening of any specified

event which does not depend on the will of

the Donor a Gift shall be suspended or

revoked; but a Gift which the parties agree

shall be revocable wholly or in part, at the

mere will of the Donor, is void wholly or in

part, as the case may be. A Gift may also be

revoked in any of the cases (save want or

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5 W.P.(MD)NO.21895 OF 2021

failure of consideration) in which, if it were

a contract, it might be rescinded. Save as

aforesaid, a Gift cannot be revoked.

Nothing contained in this section shall be

deemed to affect the rights of Transferees

for consideration without notice.”

42.Section 126 of the Transfer of

Property Act recognizes the power of

revocation where the Donor reserves a right

to suspend or revoke the Gift on happening of

any specified event. However, the illustrations

clarifies that the revocation should be with the

assent of the Donee and it shall not be at the

will of Donor as a Gift revocable at the mere

Will of the donor is void. The Sub Registrar

cannot decide whether there was consent for

revocation outside the document. If the Donor

by himself reserves a right to revoke the Gift

at his Will without the assent by Donee, the

Gift itself is void. Since we are dealing with

unilateral cancellation, the power of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

6 W.P.(MD)NO.21895 OF 2021

registration of cancellation or revocation of

Gift Deed cannot be left to the discretion or

wisdom of Registering Authority on facts

which are not available or discernible from the

Deed of Gift. When the power of revocation is

reserved under the document, it is permissible

to the Registering Officer to accept the

document revoking the Gift for registration

only in cases where the following conditions

are satisfied;

(a)There must be an Agreement

between the Donor and Donee that on the

happening of a specified event which does not

depend on the Will of the Donor the Gift shall

be suspended or revoked by the donor.

(b) Such Agreement shall be mutual

and expressive and seen from the document of

Gift.

(c) Cases, which do not fall under

Section 126 of Transfer of Property Act, unless

the cancellation of Gift or Settlement is

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

7 W.P.(MD)NO.21895 OF 2021

mutual, the registering authority shall not rely

upon the self-serving statements or recitals in

the Cancellation Deed. For example

questioning whether the Gift Deed was

accepted or acted upon cannot be decided by

the Registering authority for the purpose of

cancelling the registration of Gift or

Settlement Deed.

43.The Donor must specifically

reserves such right to suspend or revoke the

Gift Deed with the consent of Donee to attract

Section 126 of the Transfer of Property Act.

Unless the Agreement is mutual, expressed in

the recitals, the Registering Authority cannot

accept the document for registration.

However, the factual allegations with regard

to the acceptance of Gift or the issue where

the gift was acted upon or not do not come

under the purview of the Registering Officer.

Hence, the Registering Officer is not excepted

to accept the document unilaterally cancelling

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

8 W.P.(MD)NO.21895 OF 2021

the Gift Deed, merely on the basis of the

statement of the Donor or the recitals in the

document for cancellation.

44.From the discussions and

conclusions we have reached above with

reference to various provisions of Statutes and

precedents, we reiterate the dictum of Hon'ble

Supreme Court in Thota Ganga Laxmi and

Ors. V. Government of Andhra Pradesh &

Ors., (2010) 15 SCC 207 and the Full Bench

of this Court in Latif Estate Line India Ltd.,

case, 2011 (2) CTC 1(FB): AIR 2011Mad. 66

and inclined to follow the Judgment of Three

Member Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in

Veena Singh's case (2022) 7 SCC 1 and the

judgment of Two-Member Bench of Hon'ble

Supreme Court in Asset Reconstruction

Company (India) Ltd., case, 2022 SCC

Online SC 544 for the following propositions:

                                          (a)   A   sale    deed       or   a   Deed    of

                                  Conveyance        other       than        testamentary


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

9 W.P.(MD)NO.21895 OF 2021

dispositions, which is executed and registered

cannot be unilaterally cancelled.

(b) Such unilateral cancellation of

Sale Deed or a Deed of Conveyance is wholly

void and non est and does not operate to

execute, assign, limit or extinguish any right,

title or interest in the property.

(c) Such unilateral cancellation of

Sale Deed or Deed of Conveyance cannot be

accepted for registration.

(d) The Transferee or any one

claiming under him or her need not approach

the Civil Court and a Writ Petition is

maintainable to challenge or nullify the

registration.

(e) However, an absolute Deed of Sale

or Deed of Conveyance which is duly executed

by the Transferor may be cancelled by the

Civil Court at the instance of Transferor as

contemplated under Section 31 of Specific

Relief Act.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

10 W.P.(MD)NO.21895 OF 2021

(f) As regards Gift or Settlement

Deed, a Deed of Revocation or Cancellation is

permissible only in a case which fall under

Section 126 of Transfer of Property Act, and

the Registering Authority can accept the deed

of Cancellation of Gift for registration subject

to the conditions specified in Para 42 of this

judgment.

(g) The legal principles above stated

by us cannot be applied to cancellation of

Wills or Power of Attorney Deed, which are

revocable and not coupled with interest.”

6. Applying the aforesaid ratio laid down by the

Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court, the impugned registration is

quashed. This writ petition stands allowed. No costs.



                                                                              23.12.2022

                     Index    : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes/ No

                     PMU




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

11 W.P.(MD)NO.21895 OF 2021

To:

1. The District Registrar, O/o.The District Registrar Office, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District.

2. The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Melaneelithanallur, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tenkasi District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

12 W.P.(MD)NO.21895 OF 2021

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

PMU

W.P.(MD)No.21895 of 2021

23.12.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter