Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 18224 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 December, 2022
C.M.A(MD)No.636 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 16.12.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA
C.M.A(MD)No.636 of 2022
and
C.M.P(MD)No.5461 of 2022
Stalin Golden Amalraj ... Appellant/ Petitioner/
Defendant.
Vs
Ramadas ...Respondent/Petitioner/
Plaintiff
PRAYER :-
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under order 43 and Rule (1)
(q) of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the order, dated 29.04.2022 in I.A.No.
1 of 2020 in O.S.No.152 of 2020 on the file of the Additional District Court
(FTC), Tenkasi.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Vishnuvardhan
For Respondent : Mr.K.Sankar
JUDGMENT
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against order, dated
29.04.2022 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in O.S.No.152 of 2020 on the file of
the Additional District Court (FTC), Tenkasi. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A(MD)No.636 of 2022
2. The case of the plaintiff/respondent was that the appellant/defendant
had obtained a hand loan of Rs.15,00,000/- from him and executed a
promissory note for the hand loan on 01.11.2019. The respondent was said to
have issued a cheque for the loan of Rs.15,00,000/- on 16.02.2020. When the
same was deposited on 29.02.2020, it was returned by the Bank with a memo
stating that “payment was stopped by drawer”. The respondent/plaintiff
therefore filed I.A.No.1 of 2020 in O.S.No.152 of 2020 for attachement of
property before judgment under Order 38 and Rules 5 and 6 of Civil
Procedure Code.
3. When I.A.No.1 of 2020 was taken up by the lower Court, a cryptic
order was passed as follows:
“Heard on the both side of the petitioner. Records perused. From the EC it is established that the respondent is the owner of the Scheduled Property. It is stated by the Petitioners that the respondent is taking steps to dispose the Scheduled Property. Therefore to recover the suit amount it is necessary to Attach the Property. Attach by 13.06.2022.”
4. The learned counsel for the appellant/defendant submits that the
order is a non-speaking order and against the provisions of Order 38 Rules 5
and 6 of Civil Procedure Code. Therefore, the learned counsel for the
appellant prays to allow the appeal.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A(MD)No.636 of 2022
5. The learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits that the matter
may be remitted back to the lower Court for fresh consideration.
6. I find force in the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant
that procedure contemplated under Order 38 Rules 5 and 6 of CPC has not
been followed and therefore, the order in I.A.No.1 of 2020, dated 29.04.2022
is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Additional District Court
(FTC), Tenkasi for fresh consideration in accordance with law. The Additional
District Judge (FTC), Tenkasi is directed to dispose of the matter on merits
and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of
receipt of copy of this order. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed. No
costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
16.12.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sn
To
1.The Additional District Court (FTC), Tenkasi
2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A(MD)No.636 of 2022
N.MALA, J sn
C.M.A(MD)No.636 of 2022
16.12.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!