Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 18067 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2022
Crl.R.C.(MD).No.18 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.12.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
Crl.R.C.(MD).No.18 of 2020
P.Muthaiah ... Petitioner/Respondent/Accused
Vs.
L.Arumugam ...Respondent/Appellant/Complainant
PRAYER: This Civil Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of
the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the
Judgment passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge,
Palani in C.A.No.85 of 2018 dated 11.12.2019 reversing the Judgment
passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II cum Fast Track Court
(Magistrate level), Madurai in S.T.C.No.125 of 2016 dated 13.04.2018 and
set aside the same.
For Petitioner : Mr. Karuppasamy Pandiyan.G
For Respondent : Mr. Vinoth Kumar.B
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.(MD).No.18 of 2020
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Case has been filed to call for the records
pertaining to the Judgment passed by the learned Additional District and
Sessions Judge, Palani in C.A.No.85 of 2018 dated 11.12.2019 reversing the
Judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II cum Fast Track
Court (Magistrate level), Madurai in S.T.C.No.125 of 2016 dated
13.04.2018 and set aside the same.
2.The offence is under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. The
defacto complainant filed a complaint stating that he and the revision
petitioner are friends. He borrowed a sum of Rs.1,30,000/- in November
2010 for meeting out his family expenses. Towards discharge of the above
said amount, he issued a cheque on 01.01.2011, that was presented for
payment on 04.01.2011, the same was returned as insufficient fund on
28.01.2011 and he sent a notice on 04.02.2022 demanding payment of the
amount which was received by the respondent by 07.01.2022 but no reply
was given. He filed the above said complaint under Section 138 of
Negotiable Instrument Act before the trial Court. The trial Court has
acquitted the accused, against which, the appeal has been preferred by the
complainant before the Additional District Judge, Madurai in Crl.A.No.85
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD).No.18 of 2020
of 2018, in which, the judgment of acquittal was reversed and the appellate
Court found guilty as agaisnt the accused under Section 138 of Negotiable
Instrument Act. Accordingly, he was convicted and sentenced to undergo
one year Simple Imprisonment and Rs.1,30,000/- as compensation, against
which, this revision has been preferred. Pending revision, compromise has
been entered between the parties before the Mediation Centre.
3. Since there is a settlement between the parties before the Mediation
Centre, this Revision Case preferred by the accused is allowed and the
judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional
District and Sessions Judge, Palani in C.A.No.85 of 2018 dated 11.12.2019
is set aside.
4. The respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.50,000/-
which was deposited by the petitioner before the trial Court, for which, the
Revision Petitioner has no objection. The Mediation Report shall form part
of the order.
07.12.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No indu
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD).No.18 of 2020
G.ILANGOVAN,J.
indu
To
The Government Advocate (Crl.Side), Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Crl.R.C.(MD).No.18 of 2020
07.12.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!