Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 18036 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 December, 2022
CRP.No.1237 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
CRP.No.1237 of 2017
and CMP.No.5855 of 2017
1.Minor Deepa
2.Minor Mohan
(minor petitioners 1 & 2 represented by their mother)
3.Chitra ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.Panaiyan
2.Mannu alias Ramasamy
3.Govindammal
4.Govindasamy
5.Panjali ... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India praying to set aside the order in unnumbered OS.No. of 2016 on the
file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Krishnagiri dated 15.09.2016
and to direct the lower court to number the suit.
For Petitioners : Mr.M.John Kennady
For Respondents
For R1 & 2 : Mr.D.Maharajan
For R3 : Mr.V.Nicholas
For R4 : Mr.G.Govindasamy
for Mr.Dalit Tiger C.Ponnusamy
For R5 : Mr.B.Gnana Vinothan
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 1 of 4
CRP.No.1237 of 2017
ORDER
This civil revision petition is filed as against the order passed in
unnumbered OS.No. of 2016 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate
Judge, Krishnagiri dated 15.09.2016, thereby rejected the suit for the reason
that the suit is barred by res judicata.
2. Heard, Mr.M.John Kennady, the learned counsel for the
petitioners, Mr.D.Maharajan, the learned counsel for respondents 1 & 2,
Mr.V.Nicholas, the learned counsel for the third respondent,
Mr.G.Govindasamy, the learned counsel for the fourth respondent and
Mr.Gnana Vinothan, the learned counsel for the fifth respondent.
3. It is seen from the records that the present suit is filed for partition
claiming 2/5 share in respect of the subject property. The third plaintiff i.e. the
mother for the plaintiffs 1 and 2 is claiming to be the second wife of the second
respondent herein. Already suit for partition was filed by defendants 2 to 5 in
OS.No.84 of 2005 for partition in which already preliminary decree was passed
on 21.01.2009. On perusal of the said judgment and decree revealed that the
sister of the second defendant is claiming 1/2 share against the second
defendant and one Mr.Govindasamy. The said Govindasamy was set exparte.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP.No.1237 of 2017
The said suit was contested by the second respondent and the present suit is
also filed as against the very same property which was allotted to the parties.
Therefore, the present suit is clearly barred by principle of res judicata and the
court below rightly rejected the same. Therefore, this Court finds no infirmity
or illegality in the order passed by the court below.
4. Accordingly, the present civil revision petition is dismissed.
However, if at all any claim as against the second defendant, the petitioners are
at liberty to file suit as against the second respondent alone in respect of their
internal disputes. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
05.12.2022 Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking order/non-speaking order lok
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP.No.1237 of 2017
lok To The learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Krishnagiri
CRP.No.1237 of 2017
05.12.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!