Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S. Narayanan vs The Principal Chief Conservator ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 18018 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 18018 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2022

Madras High Court
S. Narayanan vs The Principal Chief Conservator ... on 2 December, 2022
                                                                                     W.P. No.32305 of 2022


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED: 02.12.2022

                                                          CORAM:

                                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                                    W.P. No.32305 of 2022


                     S. Narayanan                                                    ... Petitioner
                                                    Vs.
                     1. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest,
                     Panagal Building,
                     Saidapet,
                     Chennai – 15.

                     2. The Wildlife Warden,
                     Wildlife Warden Office,
                     Teynampet,
                     Chennai – 600 006.

                     3. The Superintendent (Forest Ranger),
                     Guindy National Park,
                     Rajbavan,
                     Chennai – 600 022.                                     ...      Respondents


                     Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                     to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pass order on
                     the petitioners representation dated 14.3.2016 and 21.9.2021

                                  For petitioner      : Mr.T. Dharani
                                  For respondents     : Dr.T. Seenivasan,
                                                        Special Government Pleader



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/5
                                                                                     W.P. No.32305 of 2022



                                                          ORDER

By consent of both the parties, this writ petition has been taken up

for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. Dr.T. Seenivasan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts

notice for the respondents.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite having been

acquitted on 24.11.2014 by the judgment of the IX Judicial Magistrate

Court, Saidapet in C.C. No.7427 of 2004, he has not been reinstated into

service.

4. Earlier the petitioner's service as a Mazdoor was terminated and

he had challenged the said termination before this Court in W.P. No.24748

of 2004. By order dated 23.09.2008, this Court in the said writ petition

after holding that the termination order is not in accordance with law

quashed the same and granted liberty to the respondents to initiate

appropriate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner. According to

the petitioner, till date, no disciplinary proceedings were initiated by the

respondents against him. The criminal case which was earlier pending

against him has also ended in acquittal on 24.11.2014. In such

circumstances, he claims that he has to be reinstated into service. The

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P. No.32305 of 2022

petitioner has given representations to the respondents requesting them to

reinstate him into service. Since the representations have not been

considered till date, this writ petition has been filed.

5. Heard Ms.T. Dharani, learned counsel for the petitioner and

Dr.T.Seenivasan, learned Special Government Pleader for the

respondents.

6. At the outset, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing

for the respondents would submit that the petitioner will have to give a

fresh representation.

7. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner

is allowed to give a fresh representation seeking for reinstatement and a

direction is issued to the respondents to consider the same on merits and in

accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

8. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the petitioner to

submit a fresh representation to the 1st respondent seeking for

reinstatement into service as Mazdoor, within a period of one week from

the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said

representation, the 1st respondent shall pass final orders on merits and in

accordance with law on the petitioner's representation, within a period of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P. No.32305 of 2022

twelve weeks thereafter.

9. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No

costs.

02.12.2022

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order vsi2

To :

1. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai – 15.

2. The Wildlife Warden, Wildlife Warden Office, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

3. The Superintendent (Forest Ranger), Guindy National Park, Rajbavan, Chennai – 600 022.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P. No.32305 of 2022

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

vsi2

W.P. No.32305 of 2022

02.12.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter