Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14742 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2022
T.C.A.No.555 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 23.08.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Tax Case Appeal No.555 of 2010
AND
M.P.No.1 of 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai .. Appellant
Vs.
Panasonic Cabon India Co. Ltd.
Pottipatti Plaza II Floor
77/35, Nungambakkam High Road
Chennai 600 034 .. Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the order dated 10.07.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.No.1971/Mds/2008.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.R.Venkatanarayan
for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
T.C.A.No.555 of 2010
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
This tax case appeal has been filed by the appellant/Revenue, calling in
question the correctness of the order dated 10.07.2009 passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.No.1971/Mds/2008,
relating to the assessment year 2002-03.
2. By order dated 12.07.2010, this Court admitted the aforesaid tax case
appeal on the following substantial question of law :
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in deleting the addition made on account of the provision for salary/wages amounting to Rs.27,83,521/-?”
3. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned Standing
Counsel for the appellant/Revenue brought to the notice of this court the
Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, issued by the Central Board Direct
Taxes, wherein, it is stipulated that appeal shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.555 of 2010
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned Standing
Counsel for the appellant/Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is
said to be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn,
keeping open the substantial question of law for determination in an appropriate
case. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[R.M.D,J.] [M.S.Q, J.]
23.08.2022
Internet : Yes
gya
To
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai
2.The Deptuy Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle V(1) Chennai
3.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-V Chennai
4.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench, Chennai
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.555 of 2010
gya
Tax Case Appeal No.555 of 2010
23.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!