Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14710 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2022
TCA.No.404 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.08.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
T.C.A.No. 404 of 2013
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai .. Appellant
Versus
M/s. Sabre International Ltd.,
SF No.6/1, Nedungur,
Karudayampalayam (PO),
K. Paramathi, Karur 639 111 .. Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras
“B” Bench, dated 12.12.2012 passed in I.T.A.No.655/Mds/2012 in
respect of assessment year 2007-08.
For Appellant : M//s.M. Swaminathan
V. Pushpa
Standing Counsel
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TCA.No.404 of 2013
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the appellant / revenue,
questioning the correctness of the order dated 12.12.2012 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “B” Bench, Chennai, in
I.T.A.No.655/Mds/2012 for the assessment year 2007-08.
2. On 13.08.2013, this tax case appeal is admitted by this Court on
the following substantial questions of law;
' 1. Whether on the fact and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that expenses incurred for setting up of the unit with respect to salary, Provident Fund, Staff Welfare expenses, electricity charges, water charges, travelling expenses, vehicle maintenance and other maintenance, all with respect to setting up of new unit in Karur and Panipet, are revenue in nature?
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that assessee is entitled for deduction under Section 80IA with respect to the wind mill division?”
3. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA.No.404 of 2013
counsel for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the
Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct
Taxes, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by
the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does
not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that
the tax effect in this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned
counsel for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax
effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as
withdrawn, keeping open the substantial questions of law for
determination in an appropriate case. No costs.
[R.M.D,J.] [M.S.Q., J.]
22.08.2022
msr
Index : Yes / No
To
1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle I, Tiruchirappalli.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Tiruchirappalli.
3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “B” Bench, Chennai
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA.No.404 of 2013
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
msr
T.C.A.No. 404 of 2013
22.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!