Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14616 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2022
TCA.No.523 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.08.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
T.C.A.No. 523 of 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai .. Appellant
Versus
M/s.Aqua Omega Services Pvt. Ltd.,
No.6, Valliammal Road,
1st Floor, Vepery,
Chennai 600 007 ..
Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “A”
Bench, Chennai, dated 10.01.2013 passed in I.T.A.No.1648/Mds/2012 in
respect of assessment year 2008-09.
For Appellant : Mr. T. Ravikumar
Standing Counsel
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TCA.No.523 of 2013
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the appellant / revenue,
questioning the correctness of the order dated 10.01.2013 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “A” Bench, Chennai in
I.T.A.No.1648/Mds/2012 for the assessment year 2008-09.
2. On 06.03.2014, this tax case appeal was admitted by this Court on the
following substantial questions of law;
' 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the Section 40(a)(i) is not attracted?
2. Whether the finding of the Tribunal is proper especially after the insertion of the explanation to Section 9 by Finance Act, 2009 with retrospective effect from 01.06.1976 where the services rendered to technicians engaged outside India are to be treated as deemed income and are taxable?”
3. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for
the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA.No.523 of 2013
wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is said to
be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping
open the substantial questions of law for determination in an appropriate case.
No costs.
[R.M.D,J.] [M.S.Q.,
J.]
17.08.2022
msr
Index : Yes / No
To
1. The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle I(2), Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) III, Chennai-34.
3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “A” Bench, Chennai
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA.No.523 of 2013
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
msr
T.C.A.No. 523 of 2013
17.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!