Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14608 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 17.08.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
A.S(MD)No.32 of 2013
and
CROSS OBJECTION(MD)NO.9 OF 2013
and
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013
A.S(MD)No.32 of 2013
M.P.R.Malaiandi @Ashok :Appellant/Plaintiff
.vs.
1.A.Pitchai Arasu(died)
2.S.K.V.Chandra
3.P.Rajkumar
4.R.Vanitha
5.R.Preethi
(Respondents 2 to 5 are brought on record as legal representatives
of the deceased sole respondent as per order of this Court made in
C.M.P(MD)No.5509 of 2022 in A.S(MD)No.32 of 2013, dated
7.7.2022) :Respondents/Defendants
CROSS OBJECTION(MD)NO.9 OF 2013
1.A.Pitchai Arasu(died)
2.P.Chandra
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3.R.Vanitha
4.P.Rajakumar
5.P.Preethi :Cross Objectors/Respondents/
Defendants2
/vs/
M.P.R.Malaiandi @ Ashok :Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff
(Cross Objectors 2 to 5 are brought on record as legal
representatives of the deceased sole Cross Objector as per order of
this Court made in C.M.P(MD)No.4264 of 2022 in Cross
Objection(MD)No.9 of 2013, dated 22.6.2022)
PRAYER in APPEAL SUIT: First Appeal filed under Section 96 of
the Civil Procedure Code read with Order 41 Rule 1 and 2 of Civil
Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.
501 of 2004, dated 20.11.2012, on the file of Fifth Additional
District Judge, Madurai.
PRAYER in CROSS OBJECTION: Cross Objection filed A.S(MD)No.
32 of 2013 under Order 41 Rule 22 of Civil Procedure Code against
the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.501 of 2004, dated
20.11.2012, on the file of Fifth Additional District Judge, Madurai.
A.S(MD)No.32 of 2013
For Appellant :Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan
For Respondent-1 :Died
For Respondents :Mr.M.Sengu Vijay
2 to 5
2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CROSS OBJECTION(MD)NO.9 OF 2013
For Cross Objectors :Mr.M.Sengu Vijay
For Respondent :Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan
JUDGMENT
*********
In the earlier hearing date,ie., on 1.8.2022, at the request of
the learned counsel for the appellant, the matter is posted today.
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel
for the appellant as well as the Cross-Objectors are not ready to
argue the appeal suit as well as the Cross-Objection and sought for
adjournment.This shows that the learned counsel for the
appellant /Cross Objectors are not interested in prosecuting the
appeal suit as well as the Cross-Objection. Therefore both the
Appeal Suit as well as the Cross-Objection are dismissed for non-
prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous
Petition is dismissed.
17.08.2022
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
vsn
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To
1.The Vth Additional District Judge, Madurai.
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis P.VELMURUGAN.,J.
vsn
COMMON JUDGMENT MADE IN A.S(MD)No.32 of 2013 and CROSS OBJECTION(MD)NO.9 OF 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013
17.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!