Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Aravind Laboratories vs Mr.Ajay Prasad Gupta
2022 Latest Caselaw 14594 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14594 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2022

Madras High Court
Aravind Laboratories vs Mr.Ajay Prasad Gupta on 17 August, 2022
                                                                       C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.57 of 2022

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 17.08.2022

                                                      CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR
                                              RAMAMOORTHY

                                           C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.57 of 2022
                                         and A.Nos.1323, 2128, 2129 of 2022
                                            and O.A.Nos.160, 161 of 2022


                     Aravind Laboratories
                     Rep by its Partner and
                     Joint Proprietor of the Registered Trademark
                     Mr.R.Rajagopal
                     Residing at
                     Old No.82, New No.76,
                     Dr.Ranga Road, Mylapore,
                     Chennai - 600 004.                                             ... Plaintiff

                                                         vs.

                     Mr.Ajay Prasad Gupta
                     Proprietor
                     Gopal Cosmetics Products (India)
                     M.E.School Road,
                     Near Seva Sadan Hospital,
                     Jugsalai,
                     Jamshedpur - 831 006.                                       ... Defendant




                     1/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.57 of 2022

                     PRAYER: Plaint filed under Order IV, Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules

                     And Order VII, Rule 1 of the CPC Read with Sections 27(2), 29, 134 and

                     135 of the Trademarks Act, 1999, prayed for Judgment and Decree:-



                                  (a) Granting a permanent injunction, restraining the Defendants, by

                     itself, its servants, agents, distributors, or anyone claiming through them

                     from manufacturing, selling, advertising and offering for sale using the

                     Trade Mark FAX DALLEE upon the goods or in any media and use the

                     same in Cosmetics and Herbal Extracts For Cosmetic Purposes Including

                     Nail Polish and Remover, Sindur, Taral Alta, Nail Glitter, Face Pack,

                     Lotion, Soaps & Shampoo And Conditioner, Hand Wash, Hand Cleaner,

                     Bleaching Preparation & Perfumery, Lip Care, Lipstick, Mascara, Facial

                     Pack, Kajal, Power, Toothpaste, Cream, Hand Wash, Hand Cleanser,

                     Lotion, Bindi, Blusher, Eye Liner, Eye Shadow In Powder And Liquid

                     Form, Pencil For Lips, Eyes And Eye Brows, Lip Gloss, Cream and

                     Compact Powder (Cosmetics), Essential Oil, Hair Oil & Gel, Hair Colour &

                     Dye, Hair Spray, Deodorant, Fragrances And Perfumery Products, invoices,

                     letter heads and visiting cards or on any other cosmetics by using any other


                     2/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.57 of 2022

                     trade mark which is in any way visually, phonetically or deceptively similar

                     to the Plaintiff Trade Marks, EYETEX DAZLLER, DAZLLER, EYETEX

                     DAZLLER and, DAZLLER ETERNA or in any manner infringing the

                     Plaintiff Registered Trade Mark Nos.1261112, 1261117, 3751465,

                     4801318, 4926040, 4926041.



                                  (b) Granting a permanent injunction, restraining the Defendant, by

                     themselves, their servants, agents, men, or anyone claiming through them

                     from manufacturing, marketing, distributing, offering or advertising or

                     using the Mark FAX DAZLLEE or similar sounding names in the course of

                     their business and pass off their Cosmetics and Herbal Extracts For

                     Cosmetic Purposes Including Nail Polish and Remover, Sindur, Taral Alta,

                     Nail Glitter, Face Pack, Lotion, Soaps & Shampoo And Conditioner, Hand

                     Wash, Hand Cleaner, Bleaching Preparation & Perfumery, Lip Care,

                     Lipstick, Mascara, Facial Pack, Kajal, Powder, Toothpaste, Cream, Hand

                     Wash, Hand Cleanser, Lotion, Bindi, Blusher, Eye Liner, Eye ShadowIn

                     Powder And Liquid Form, Pencil For Lips, Eyes And Eye Brows, Lip Bloss,

                     Cream and Compact Powder (Cosmetics), Essential Oil, Hair Oil & Gel,


                     3/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                    C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.57 of 2022

                     Hair Colour & Dye, Hair Spray, Deodorant, Fragrances And Perfumery

                     Products using the Trade Mark FAX DAZLLEE as and for the, EYETEX

                     DAZLLER, DAZLLER, EYETEX DAZLLER and DAZLLER ETERNA

                     goods of the Plaintiff or enable others to pass off.



                                  (c) Directing the Defendant to surrender to the Plaintiff all the

                     packing material, cartons, advertisement materials and hoardings, letter-

                     heads, visiting cards, office stationery and all other materials containing /

                     bearing the Trade Mark FAX DAZLLEE or other deceptively similar Trade

                     Mark.



                                  (d) For a preliminary decree in favour of the Plaintiff, directing the

                     Defendants to render an account of profits made by them by the use of the

                     Trade Mark FAX DAZLLEE on the goods referred and for a final decree in

                     favour of the Plaintiff for the amount of the profits found to have been made

                     by the Defendant, after the Defendant has rendered accounts.



                                  (e) Directing the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the costs to the suit.


                     4/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.57 of 2022




                                       For Plaintiff     : Ms.T.Hemalatha
                                                           for M/s.C.Daniel

                                       For Defendant     : Mr.R.Sathish Kumar

                                                         **********

                                                       JUDGMENT

In a suit for alleged trademark infringement and passing off, the

parties have executed a Memorandum of Compromise dated 12.08.2022.

On examining the same, it has been duly executed by the partner of the

plaintiff and the proprietor of the defendant. The respective counsel have

also signed the said Memorandum of Compromise. As per the terms

thereof, the defendant has submitted to a judgment and decree in terms of

prayers (a) and (b) of paragraph 31 of the plaint. The defendant has further

undertaken to withdraw the application filed for registration of the

trademark FAX DAZLLEE under Application No.4795592 dated

25.12.2020 under class 3. The plaintiff has acknowledged that they have no

objection to the defendant using the carton / label / packet shown in

Annexure - A of the Memorandum of Compromise. Other terms ancillary to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.57 of 2022

the compromise were also agreed upon. I see no legal impediment to the

issuance of a decree in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise.

2. In the result, C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.57 of 2022 is decreed in terms

of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 12.08.2022, which shall form an

integral part thereof. In view of the settlement, there will be no order as to

costs. Consequently, A.Nos.1323, 2128, 2129 of 2022 and O.A.Nos.160,

161 of 2022 are closed.

17.08.2022 rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.57 of 2022

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J

rna

C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.57 of 2022 and A.Nos.1323, 2128, 2129 of 2022 and O.A.Nos.160, 161 of 2022

17.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter