Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14517 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2022
TCA.No.865 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.08.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
T.C.A.No. 865 of 2017
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai .. Appellant
Versus
M/s.Cooper Standard Automotive India
Pvt. Ltd.,
3-A, Ford Supplier Park,
Kilakaram Village, Melrosapuram Post,
Singaperumal Koil,
Chengalattu 603 204. .. Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “B”
Bench, dated 12.05.2017 passed in M.P.No.308 of 2016 in
I.T.A.No.794/Mds/2016 in respect of assessment year 2005-06.
For Appellant : Mr. T. Ravikumar
Standing Counsel
For Respondent : No appearance
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TCA.No.865 of 2017
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the appellant / revenue,
questioning the correctness of the order dated 12.5.2017 passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “B” Bench, Chennai, in M.P.No.308 of 2016
in I.T.A.No.794/Mds/2016 for the assessment year 2005-06.
2. On 14.09.2020, this tax case appeal was admitted by this Court on the
following substantial question of law;
' Whether the Tribunal was right in recalling the order passed under section 254(2) when the original order dated 22.7.2016 was one passed on merits and therefore recalling the same would tantamount to reviewing the order which power was not vested in the Tribunal?”
3. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA.No.865 of 2017
this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is said to
be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping
open the substantial question of law for determination in an appropriate case.
No costs.
[R.M.D,J.] [M.S.Q.,
J.]
16.08.2022
msr
Index : Yes / No
To
1. The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle I(3), Chennai.
2. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 1, Chennai-34.
3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “B” Bench, Chennai
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA.No.865 of 2017
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
msr
T.C.A.No. 865 of 2017
16.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!