Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kalimuthu vs The State Represented By
2022 Latest Caselaw 14407 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14407 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2022

Madras High Court
Kalimuthu vs The State Represented By on 12 August, 2022
                                                                          Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14151 of 2022

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                      DATED: 12.08.2022

                                                          CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                             Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14151 of 2022
                                                          and
                                              Crl.M.P(MD)No.9095 of 2022


                     Kalimuthu,                                               : Petitioner

                                                             Vs

                     1. The State represented by
                     The Inspector of Police,
                     Seethaparpanallur Police Station,
                     Tirunelveli.
                     Crime.No.130 of 2017.

                     2. Alagumuthu,                                           : Respondents


                     PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
                     praying to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Charge Sheet
                     in Spl.S.C.No. 99 of 2019 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge,
                     Special Court for POCSO Act Cases, Tirunelveli District and quash the
                     same.

                                     For petitioner       : M/s Anbarasu.D,
                                     For R1               : Mr.A.Albert James,
                                                          Government Advocate (Crl.Side)


                     1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                          Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14151 of 2022

                                                           ORDER

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the Charge

Sheet in Spl.S.C.No. 99 of 2019 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge,

Special Court for POCSO Act Cases, Tirunelveli District, for the offences

punishable under Section 366 IPC and Section 12 of Protection of Child

from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 in Crime No.130/2017.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and defacto

complainant loved each other. On knowing this, the defacto complainant

arranged marriage for his daughter with some other person. Therefore,

she went away from her house and after attaining age of majority, she

married the petitioner. Meanwhile, the defacto complainant lodged a

complaint against the accused person.

3.The case is under trial. By passage of time, the parties have

decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably

among themselves.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14151 of 2022

4. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court

which have been signed by the petitioner and the second respondent and

also by their respective counsel. The petitioner and the second

respondent were also present in person before this Court and they were

identified by Mr.Ramakrishnan, HC of Police, Seethaparpanallur Police

Station, Tirunelveli as well as by the learned Counsels appearing for the

parties. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that

the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

5. In the instant case, the dispute is of personal in nature and the

parties had compromised. Where the parties have compromised the

matter, the High Court has to power to quash the complaint for the

offence under Section 366 IPC and Section 12 of Protection of Child

from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

6. The legal position expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the

case of Gian Singh vs. State of Panjab and another reported in

(2012)10 SCC 303 and Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14151 of 2022

of Gujrath) reported in (2017)9 SCC 641 were taken into consideration.

7. In the light of the guidelines issued in the above said Judgments

of the Hon'ble Apex Court, no useful purpose will be served in keeping

the proceedings in Spl.S.C.No. 99 of 2019 on the file of the learned

Sessions Judge, Special Court for POCSO Act Cases, Tirunelveli District

even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature.

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and

as a sequel, the proceedings in Spl.S.C.No. 99 of 2019 on the file of the

learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for POCSO Act Cases, Tirunelveli

District is quashed and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form

part and parcel of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous

petition is closed.

12.08.2022

Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order lr

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14151 of 2022

To

1.The Inspector of Police, Seethaparpanallur Police Station, Tirunelveli.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14151 of 2022

V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

lr

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14151 of 2022

12.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter