Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14365 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2022
T.C.A.Nos.755 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.08.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
T.C.A.Nos.755 of 2016
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai. ...
Appellant
Versus
M/s. A.V.Thomas Leathers and allied Products Ltd.,
22, Marshalls Road, Egmore,
Chennai - 600 008.
PAN: AAACA 6246K ...
Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
against the order dated 05.02.2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, “A” Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.No.2067/Mds/2015.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : R.Sivaraman
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 1/4
T.C.A.Nos.755 of 2016
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of this Court was delivered by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)
This tax case appeal has been filed by the appellant / Revenue,
challenging the order dated 05.02.2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench, in I.T.A.No.2067/Mds/2015, relating to the
assessment year 2012-2013.
2.By order dated 26.10.2016, this court admitted the aforesaid tax case
appeal on the following substantial question of law:
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the receipts on sale of agricultural land has to be reduced from the book profits for the purpose of computing income under section 115JB of the Income tax Act?"
3.When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
appearing for the respondent / assessee submitted that during the pendency of
this tax case appeal, the assessee has availed the benefit conferred under the
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and filed necessary declarations, which
were accepted and Form 5 / order for full and final settlement of tax arrears,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2/4 T.C.A.Nos.755 of 2016
was also issued by the Income tax department, on 16.03.2021.
4.The aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the
respondent/assessee has also been fairly conceded by the learned standing
counsel appearing for the appellant/ Revenue.
5.In view of the subsequent development, this court is of the opinion that
nothing survives for adjudication in this appeal. Recording the submission so
made by the learned counsel on either side, the Tax Case Appeal stands
disposed of. No costs.
[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.]
11.08.2022
Internet : Yes
Index : Yes / No
av
To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle 1(1), Chennai-34.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3/4 T.C.A.Nos.755 of 2016
4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chennai.
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
av
T.C.A.No.775 of 2016
11.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4/4
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!