Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ravikumar vs The Inspector Of Police
2022 Latest Caselaw 14361 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14361 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2022

Madras High Court
Ravikumar vs The Inspector Of Police on 11 August, 2022
                                                                     Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13411 of 2022

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED:11.08.2022

                                                      CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                           Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13411 of 2022
                                          and Crl.M.P(MD) No.8545 of 2022

                     Ravikumar                                                 ... Petitioner
                                                           Vs.

                     1. The Inspector of Police
                        Kallal Police Station
                        Sivagangai District

                     2. Sivakumar
                        Probation Officer
                        Social Welfare Department
                        Sivagangai                                             ....Respondents


                     PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
                     praying to call for the records in Spl.S.C.No. 48 of 2019 pending on the
                     file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under the POCSO
                     Act 2012, Sivagangai and quash the same as illegal in respect of this
                     petitioner

                                     For Petitioner  : [email protected] Sekar
                                     For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar
                                     No.1              Additional Public Prosecutor

                     1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                         Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13411 of 2022



                                                         ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the

proceedings in Spl.S.C.No. 48 of 2019 pending on the file of the Special

Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under the POCSO Act 2012,

Sivagangai

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

petitioner along with other accused were charged for the offences under

Sections 21(1) r/w.17 of the POCSO Act, 2012 by the respondent police.

The case against this petitioner was split up in the year 2013. With regard

to the remaining accused, the trial was conducted before the Special

Court for Exclusive trial of cases under the POCSO Act, Sivagangai and

all the accused were acquitted by an judgment dated 20.04.2022. Further

the victim has not supported the case of the prosecution. Under these

circumstances keeping the case pending as against this petitioner would

be of no use, hence he pleaded to quash the same.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13411 of 2022

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that

originally the petitioner along with other accused were charged for

offences under Sections 21(1)r/w.Section 17 of POCSO Act, 2012 by the

respondent police. As against this petitioner, the case was split up in

Spl.S.C. No.48 of 2019 and with regard to other accused persons, the

trial was conducted and ended in acquittal by an judgement dated

20.04.2022.

4. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondents police.

5. Perusal of the record reveals the fact that the petitioner is the 9th

accused in Special S.C. No.65 of 2018 pending on the file of the Special

Court for Exclusive trial of cases under the POCSO Act, Sivagangai.

The case against the petitioner was split up in Special S.C. No.48 of 2019

and with regard to the other accused trial was conducted. Since the

prosecution witnesses not supported the prosecution case, the case ended

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13411 of 2022

in acquittal on 20.04.2022. Now the split up case in Spl.S.C.No.48 of

2019 is alone pending as against the petitioner. Since the prosecution

witnesses not supported the prosecution case, keeping the case pending

as against this petitioner will not serve any purpose, hence it is liable to

be quashed.

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and

as a sequel, the proceedings in Spl.S.C.No. 48 of 2019 pending on the

file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under the POCSO

Act 2012, Sivagangai, is quashed insofar as the petitioner alone.

Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

11.08.2022

Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order aav

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13411 of 2022

To

1. The Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under the POCSO Act 2012, Sivagangai

2. The Inspector of Police Kallal Police Station Sivagangai District

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13411 of 2022

V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

aav

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13411 of 2022

11.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter