Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Terex India Private Limited
2022 Latest Caselaw 14273 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14273 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2022

Madras High Court
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Terex India Private Limited on 10 August, 2022
                                                                         T.C.A.Nos.928 & 929 of 2019


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED 10.08.2022

                                                      CORAM

                                    THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
                                                       AND
                                  THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

                                           T.C.A.Nos.928 and 929 of 2019


                The Commissioner of Income Tax
                ACIT Circle I, Hosur
                (previously assessed at New Delhi)                  .. Appellant in both T.C.As

                                                         Vs.

                Terex India Private Limited
                5th Floor, West Wing, E-City, Tower-2
                #94/2 & 95/2, Electronic City, Phase-I
                Hosur Main Road, Bangalore 560 100
                PAN : AACCT6500D                                  .. Respondent in both T.C.As

                          Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,
                1961, against the order dated 26.03.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
                Tribunal 'I-2', New Delhi, in respective I.T.A.Nos.6775/Del/2015 and
                6783/Del/2015.
                                     For Appellant    Mr.M.Swaminathan
                                     in both T.C.As   Mrs.V.Pushpa
                                                      Standing Counsels
                                     For Respondent   Mr.Karthik Sundaram
                                     in both T.C.As
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                1/5
                                                                             T.C.A.Nos.928 & 929 of 2019


                                           COMMON JUDGMENT

                                   (Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)




                          These Tax Case Appeals arise from the common order dated 26.03.2019

                passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'I-2', New Delhi, in respective

                I.T.A.Nos.6775/Del/2015 and 6783/Del/2015, relating to the assessment year

                2011-12.



                          2. By order dated 20.11.2019, this court admitted the aforesaid tax case

                appeals on the following substantial questions of law:

                                  “(1)Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in
                          upholding the decision of DRP in a Business Support Services Segment
                          in excluding - Global Procurement Consultant Ltd as comparable when
                          the Global Procurement Consultant Ltd is not a 100% per cent
                          Government owned company?


                                  (2)Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in
                          confirming the decision of Dispute Resolution Panel In the Engineering
                          Design Support Services Segment in selective screening of three (3)
                          comparables when they are not 100% Government owned company?


                                  (3)Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in
                          directing TPO to exclude the seven (7) comparables in the Engineering
                          Design Support Services Segment when the FAR of these comparables
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                2/5
                                                                                 T.C.A.Nos.928 & 929 of 2019


                          are essentially similar to that of assessee as confirmed by the Dispute
                          Resolution Panel?


                                  (4)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law,
                          the Hon'ble Tribunal is legally correct in directing the TPO to restrict the
                          adjustment on account of capacity to the material purchased from the AE
                          and consumed during the year, when such adjustment is not permissible
                          under the Transfer Pricing regulations?


                                  (5)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the
                          Appellate Tribunal was right in holding the loss of Rs.2,04,92,202/-
                          arising out of Foreign Exchange fluctuation on purchase of capital assets
                          is a revenue expenditure?”


                          3. When these matters were taken up for consideration, the learned

                counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee submitted that during the

                pendency of these tax case appeals, the assessee has availed the benefit

                conferred under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and filed

                necessary declarations, which were accepted and Form-5/order for full and final

                settlement of tax arrears, was also issued by the Income tax department, on

                24.11.2021. The learned counsel has also filed Form-5 dated 24.11.2021 to that

                effect.



                          4. The aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                3/5
                                                                            T.C.A.Nos.928 & 929 of 2019


                respondent/assessee has also been fairly conceded by the learned Standing

                Counsels appearing for the appellant/ Revenue.



                          5. In view of the subsequent development, this court is of the opinion that

                nothing survives for adjudication in these appeals. Recording the submission so

                made by the learned counsel on either side, these Tax Case Appeals stand

                disposed of. No costs.



                                                                       [R.M.D,J.]    [M.S.Q, J.]
                gya                                                           10.08.2022


                To

                1.The Commissioner of Income Tax
                ACIT Circle I, Hosur

                2.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'I-2'
                New Delhi

                3.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
                Circle-25(1)
                C.R.Building, New Delhi




                                                                               R. MAHADEVAN, J.

AND https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

T.C.A.Nos.928 & 929 of 2019

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

gya

T.C.A.Nos.928 & 929 of 2019

10.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter