Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Yasmine vs Chennai Metropolitan ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 14138 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14138 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2022

Madras High Court
A.Yasmine vs Chennai Metropolitan ... on 8 August, 2022
                                                                                   W.P.No.3557 of 2009

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED : 08.08.2022
                                                        CORAM

                              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                                  W.P.No.3557 of 2009

            A.Yasmine                                              ...Petitioner

                                                    Vs.
            1.Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
              Represented by its Chief Executive Officer/Senior
              Estate Officer,
              Thalamuthu Natarajan Buildings,
              No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road,
              Egmore, Chennai – 08.

            2.The Sub Registrar,
              Registration Department,
              Government of Tamil Nadu
              Chengalput – 603 003.                               ...Respondents

            Prayer:- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue
            a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the first and second respondents demanding stamp
            duty on the market value of the property instead of the stamp duty paid by the
            petitioner on the actual sale consideration in respect of the property situated at Block
            No.12, LIG – I, Plot No.15, Ninnakarai Village, Maraimalai Nagar, Pin – 603 209,
            measuring about 1500 sq.ft and consequently directing the second respondent to
            register and release the sale deed No.P200900280 dated 23.01.2009 pending on the
            file of the second respondent based on the stamp duty paid by the petitioner on the
            actual sale consideration.
                                  For Petitioner  : Mr.N.Ilangovan
                                  For Respondents : Mr.R.Arunkumar for R1
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


            1/5
                                                                                      W.P.No.3557 of 2009

                                            Mr.U.Baranidharan
                                            Additional Government Pleader for R2.
                                                       ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus

forbearing the second respondent from demanding the stamp duty on the market

value of the property and for a consequential direction to the second respondent to

register and release the sale deed that is kept as a pending document.

2.The case of the petitioner is that the first respondent developed a scheme for

allotment of plots to persons belonging to low income and middle income groups.

The petitioner was allotted a plot measuring an extent of 1500sq.ft through an

allotment order dated 07.03.2003. The petitioner was directed to pay the total cost of

the land of a sum of Rs.62,500/- by way of sixty equal monthly installments.

3.The petitioner paid the installments and requested the first respondent to

execute the sale deed. When the sale deed was presented for registration, it was kept

as a pending document on the ground that the petitioner has to pay the stamp duty as

per the market value and not as per the value that has been mentioned in the sale

deed. Aggrieved by the same, the present Writ Petition has been filed before this

Court.

4.Heard N.Ilangovan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.R.Arunkumar, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.3557 of 2009

the learned counsel for first respondent and Mr.U.Baranidharan, the learned

Additional Government Pleader for second respondent.

5.In the considered view of this Court, the question of under valuation will not

arise in a case of this nature, since the sale deed has been executed in favour of the

petitioner by a statutory authority. The registering officer has no jurisdiction to

initiate any action under Section 47 (A) (1) of the Indian Stamp Act, since there is no

reason for him to believe that the document has been undervalued. The law on this

issue is now well settled and useful reference can be made to the judgment of the

Division Bench of this Court reported in The Government of Tamil Nadu Vs.

S.Jayalakshmi and others in [2009 (1) CTC 305].

6.In view of the above, the second respondent is directed to register the sale

deed based on the stamp duty calculated on the amount mentioned in the document

and the document shall be released after registration, if it has not already been

released.

7.This Writ Petition is allowed in the above terms. No costs.

08.08.2022

ep Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.3557 of 2009

N.ANAND VENKATESH.J.,

ep

To

1.Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Represented by its Chief Executive Officer/Senior Estate Officer, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Thalamuthu Natarajan Buildings, Egmore, Chennai – 08.

2.The Sub Registrar, Registration Department, Government of Tamil Nadu Chengalput – 603 003.

W.P.No.3557 of 2009

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.3557 of 2009

08.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter