Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13972 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2022
W.A.(MD)No.801 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.08.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
W.A(MD)No.801 of 2022
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.6837 of 2022
The President,
A1541, Periyakalaiyamputhur Primary
Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society,
Palani, Dindiugl District. ... Appellant
Vs.
1.M.Latha
2.The Regional Joint Registrar,
Office of the Joint Registrar,
District Collectorate, Dindigul. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letter Patent, to set
aside the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.9652 of 2020, dated
15.06.2022.
For Appellant :Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi
For 2nd Respondent:Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar
Additional Government Pleader
***
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD)No.801 of 2022
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.S.SUNDAR, J.)
This Writ Appeal is directed against the order of Writ
Court dated 15.06.2022 made in W.P.(MD) No.9652 of 2020.
2. Heard Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi, learned
counsel for the appellant and Mr.N.Sathesh Kumar, learned Additional
Government Pleader, appearing for the second respondent. In view of the
order we propose to pass in this Writ Appeal, notice to the first
respondent is dispensed with.
3. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the
learned Single Judge while allowing the Writ Petition and setting aside
the impugned order on the ground of violation of principles of natural
justice failed to see that the appellant should be given liberty to proceed
further in accordance with law.
4. From the order of learned Single Judge, this Court is
unable to find any appreciation on merits to set aside the order of
termination. The writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is set
aside only on the ground that no enquiry was conducted before the order
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.801 of 2022
of termination. Hence, this Court is of the view that learned Single Judge
ought to have given liberty to the appellant to proceed further against
the employee in accordance with law.
5. In view of the above, this Writ Appeal is partly allowed.
While confirming the order of learned Single Judge, allowing the Writ
Petition and by setting aside the order of termination, this Court grants
liberty to the appellant to proceed against the writ petitioner by holding
an enquiry in the manner known to law. The entire exercise shall be
completed within a period of eight week from the date of receipt of a
copy of this order. Registry is directed to communicate a copy of this
order to the first respondent. No costs. Consequently, connected
Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
[S.S.S.R., J.] [S.S.Y., J.]
04.08.2022
Index : Yes / No
sj
To
The Regional Joint Registrar,
Office of the Joint Registrar,
District Collectorate, Dindigul.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.801 of 2022
S.S.SUNDAR, J.
and S.SRIMATHY, J.
sj
W.A(MD)No.801 of 2022
04.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!