Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Subramaniyan vs The Inspector Of Police
2022 Latest Caselaw 13903 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13903 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2022

Madras High Court
Subramaniyan vs The Inspector Of Police on 4 August, 2022
                                                                      Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13883 of 2022

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 04.08.2022

                                                     CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                          Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13883 of 2022


                     1. Subramaniyan
                     2. Chandrasekaran
                     3. Padma Sankar
                     4. Selva karthika                                   ... Petitioners

                                                           Vs.


                     1. The Inspector of Police
                        All Women Police Station
                        Pudukottai
                        Thoothukudi District

                     2. Suriyakala                                              ....Respondents



                     PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

                     praying to call for the records pertaining to CC No. 90 of 2021 on the file

                     of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thoothukudi and quash the

                     same as illegal.


                     1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                            Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13883 of 2022




                                        For Petitioners    : Mr.M.Benazir Begum
                                        For Respondents : Mr.A.Albert James
                                        No.1              Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

                                        No.2               : Ms. V. Janaki Devi


                                                            ORDER

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the Charge

Sheet in CC No. 90 of 2021 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate

No.III, Thoothukudi, for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b),

498(A), 406 of IPC and Sections 2(a) and 4 of TNPHW Act , in Crime

No.14 of 2020

2.The case of the prosecution is that the marriage between the first

petitioner and the defacto complainant was solemnized on 21.08.2016 as

per hindu rites and customs and they are blessed with a male child.

Thereafter due to some mis understanding they got separated and she

filed a case before the first respondent polcie. After completion of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13883 of 2022

investigation, filed final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate

No.III, Thoothukudi and the same has been taken cognizance in CC No.

90 of 2021

3.The case is under trial. By passage of time, the parties have

decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably

among themselves.

4.A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court

which have been signed by the petitioners and the second respondent and

also by their respective counsel. The petitioners and the second

respondent were also present in person before this Court and they were

identified by Mrs. A.Mariya Vijaya, WHC 1700, Pudukottai AWPS,

Thoothukudi District as well as by the learned Counsels appearing for the

parties. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that

the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13883 of 2022

5. In the instant case, the wife is the complainant and accused are

husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law and sister-in-law and the parties

had compromised. Where the parties have compromised the matter, the

High Court has to power to quash the complaint for the offence under

Sections 294(b), 498(A), 406 of IPC and Sections 4 of TNPHW Act .

6. The legal position expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the

case of Gian Singh vs. State of Panjab and another reported in

(2012)10 SCC 303 and Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State

of Gujrath) reported in (2017)9 SCC 641 were taken into consideration.

7. In the light of the guidelines issued in the above said Judgments

of the Hon'ble Apex Court, no useful purpose will be served in keeping

the proceedings in CC No. 90 of 2021 on the file of the learned Judicial

Magistrate No.III, Thoothukudi , even though, the offences involved are

not compoundable in nature.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13883 of 2022

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and

as a sequel, the proceedings in CC No. 90 of 2021 on the file of the

learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thoothukudi is quashed and the

terms of joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

04.08.2022 Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order aav

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thoothukudi

2. The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Pudukottai Thoothukudi District

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13883 of 2022

V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

aav

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13883 of 2022

04.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter