Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

N.Thamees Banu vs S.N.Syed Mohammed Abuthahir
2022 Latest Caselaw 13843 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13843 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2022

Madras High Court
N.Thamees Banu vs S.N.Syed Mohammed Abuthahir on 3 August, 2022
                                                                             TR.C.M.P(MD).No.74 of 2022


                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    DATED : 03.08.2022

                                                         CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                               TR.C.M.P(MD).No.74 of 2022
                                                         and
                                               C.M.P(MD).No.1592 of 2022

                     N.Thamees Banu                                          ... Petitioner

                                                           versus

                     S.N.Syed Mohammed Abuthahir
                          @ S.N.Syed Afzal                                    ... Respondent

                                  Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24
                     of C.P.C to withdraw the case in O.S.No.5 of 2021 on the file of the
                     Family Court, Dindigul and transfer the same to the Family Court,
                     Trichy.


                                        For Petitioner        : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen
                                        For Respondent        : Mr.C.M.Arumugam




                     1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              TR.C.M.P(MD).No.74 of 2022




                                                           ORDER

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking

transfer of the case in O.S.No.5 of 2021 from the file of the Family

Court, Dindigul, to the file of the Family Court, Trichy.

2. The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is the husband.

The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was

solemnized on 17.03.2019, as per the Muslim Rites and Customs and

out of the wedlock, they are blessed with a female child on 02.01.2020.

Due to some misunderstanding, now, they are living separately.

Thereafter, the respondent has filed O.S.No.5 of 2021 before the

Family Court, Dindigul, for divorce. Now, the petitioner and her child

are living along with her parents at Trichy. Since the petitioner alone

has to take care of her child and there is no one to accompany her, she

finds it difficult to travel from Trichy to Dindigul. Hence, she filed the

present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition to transfer the case in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.74 of 2022

O.S.No.5 of 2021 from the file of the Family Court, Dindigul to Family

Court, Trichy.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

the distance between Trichy and Dindigul is around 105 kms. He

further submits that the petitioner is not having sufficient means to

travel and she depends upon her parents to meet out her day-to-day

expenses. Since the petitioner alone has to care of her child aged about

2 years and there is no one to accompany her, she finds it difficult to

travel from Trichy to Dindigul for appearing before the Family Court,

Dindigul, for each and every hearing.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Amitha Shah vs-

Virendar Lal Shah, reported (2003)10 SCC 609) has held that the

convenience of the wife and more so of the child must be taken into

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.74 of 2022

account while deciding the petition for transfer and in the case of

Rajani Kishor Paradeshi Vs Kishor Babulal Paradeshi reported in

(2005) 12 SCC 237, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that in such type

of transfer petitions, the convenience of the wife is to be preferred over

the convenience of the husband.

6. This Court being satisfied with the reasons stated in the

affidavit filed in support of this petition and also taking into

consideration that the convenience of wife is to be taken into

consideration at the time of considering transfer petitions as held by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments cited supra, is inclined to

allow the present petition.

7. In the light of the above, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous

petition stands allowed. The proceedings in O.S.No.5 of 2021 pending

on the file of the Family Court, Dindigul, is withdrawn and ordered to

be transferred to the file of the Family Court, Trichy. The Family

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.74 of 2022

Court, Dindigul, is directed to transmit the entire case records to the

Family Court, Trichy, forthwith. The learned Judge, Family Court,

Trichy, shall dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

03.08.2022

Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes / No ogy

To

1. The Family Court, Dindigul,

2. The Family Court, Trichy.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.74 of 2022

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy

TR.C.M.P(MD).No.74 of 2022

03.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter