Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Govindarajan vs Official Trustee Of Tamil Nadu
2022 Latest Caselaw 13826 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13826 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2022

Madras High Court
R.Govindarajan vs Official Trustee Of Tamil Nadu on 3 August, 2022
                                                                        O.S.A.Nos.194, 195, 198 and 199 of 2022

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 03.08.2022

                                                            CORAM

                                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
                                                      and
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

                         O.S.A. Nos.194, 195, 198 and 199 of 2022 and C.M.P. Nos.11995,
                             11997, 11996, 11998, 12065, 12066 and 12098 of 2022


                     R.Govindarajan                                   ... Appellant in all cases

                                                               -vs-

                     Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu
                     O/o.Administrator General and Official Trustee,
                     High Court Campus,
                     Chennai-600 104.                          ... Respondent in all cases

Prayer: Original Side Appeals filed under Order 36 Rule 1 of Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the judgment and decree dated 24.06.2022 passed in Application Nos.944, 945, 947 and 948 of 2022 in C.S.No.274 of 1899.

For Appellant in all cases : Mr.V.V.Giridhar

For Respondent in all cases : Mr.M.R.Jothimanian

COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was pronounced by T.RAJA, J.)

These Original Side Appeals have been filed against the Common

Order dated 24.06.2022 passed in Application Nos.944, 945, 947 and

948 of 2022 respectively in C.S.No.274/1899 by the appellant.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.Nos.194, 195, 198 and 199 of 2022

2.Learned counsel appearing for the appellant would contend

that the property bearing Door No.46, Pycrofts Road 1 st Street,

Royapettach, Chennai-600 014 is one of the properties of the trust

estate of Malligai Merchant Charities, which is under the administration

of Official Trustee as per the order dated 01.03.1932 passed by this

Court in C.S.No.274/1899. He would further contend that the said land

was originally leased out to one P.V.Karuppan by the Official Trustee

and after obtaining the lease of the land, the entire construction was

made by him in the above land. Thereafter, he sold the superstructure

with leasehold rights in favour of one Maragathammal, who died in the

year 1966 and subsequently, her legal heirs have sold the

superstructure along with the leasehold rights in favour of appellant's

father S.Ramasamy by a Sale Deed dated 02.07.1979. After his death,

the appellant has become the tenant under the respondent as the

surviving legal heir of his father and he has been paying the monthly

rent of Rs.4,500/- as fixed by the respondent and also paying the

property tax in his name for the entire 3998 sq.ft. of building and also

paying the water tax and other taxes, after getting the electricity

connection for the entire premises in his name.

3.Learned counsel for the appellant would also contend that in

the year 1998, the respondent herein has increased the rent for the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.Nos.194, 195, 198 and 199 of 2022

land-in-question from Rs.4,500/- p.m. to Rs.63,000/- p.m. He would

further contend that when the land-in-question was leased out to his

father and the superstructure has been put up by one P.V.Karuppan, it

is not open to them to enhance the fair rent to an unreasonable higher

amount. However, when the Official Trustee has fixed the fair rent at

Rs.63,000/-, a notice dated 02.11.2019 was sent to the appellant

calling upon him to pay the revised fair rent w.e.f. 01.11.2019. As the

said amount was highly exorbitant, the appellant has been paying the

original rent of Rs.4,500/- p.m. regularly to show his bonafide.

4.In reply, Mr.M.R.Jothiraman, learned Counsel appearing on

behalf of the Official Trustee would contend that when an order dated

02.11.2019 was passed by the Official Trustee fixing the fair rent of

the land and building and also directing the appellant to pay

Rs.63,000/- p.m., till date, the appellant has not come forward to

question the correctness of the same and therefore, the said order has

become final. Therefore, it is not open to him to now challenge that

the fair rent fixed by the Official Trustee is unreasonable.

5.We also find merits on the submissions of the learned Counsel

appearing for the Official Trustee. The reason being that when the

Official Trustee has taken into account the guideline value of the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.Nos.194, 195, 198 and 199 of 2022

property situated at Door No.46, Pycrofts Road 1st Street, Royapettah,

Chennai-600 014, opposite to the Express Avenue in Royapettah, it is

not known why the appellant has not come forward to question the

same till date. In any event, as the said order has become final, the

appellant has no other option except to pay the fair rent failing which

he has to leave the premises.

6.At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted

that if some reasonable breathing time is given to pay the rental

arrears, namely, Rs.24,34,500/-, the same would be paid by the

appellant.

7.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also

the fact that the covid-19 pandemic situation has taken over all of us,

this breathing time sought for by the appellant is justified. Therefore,

we are granting 3 months time from today to the appellant to pay the

arrears of fair rent in three instalments. It is made clear that in the

first and second instalments, the appellant shall pay Rs.8,11,500/-

each month and in the 3rd instalment, they would clear the remaining

amount and simultaneously, they shall also continue to pay the

monthly rent of Rs.63,000/- without any default.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.Nos.194, 195, 198 and 199 of 2022

8.Needless to mention that if the appellant commits any default

in payment of arrears of rent, it is open to the Official Trustee to take

over the land-in-question. Till then, the parties are directed to

maintain status-quo as on today.

9.With the above observations and directions, these Original Side

Appeals are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected

Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

                                                                       (T.R.J.,)     (K.B.J.,)
                                                                            03.08.2022

                     vga

                     To

                     Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu

O/o.Administrator General and Official Trustee, High Court Campus, Chennai-600 104.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.Nos.194, 195, 198 and 199 of 2022

T.RAJA,J.

AND K.KUMARESH BABU,J.

vga

O.S.A. Nos.194, 195, 198 and 199 of 2022 and C.M.P. Nos.11995, 11997, 11996, 11998, 12065, 12066 and 12098 of 2022

03.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter