Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13804 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2022
TR.C.M.P(MD)No.9 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.08.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
TR.C.M.P(MD)No.9 of 2022
and
C.M.P(MD)No.187 of 2022
Menaga ... Petitioner
Vs
Muthukrishnan ... Respondent
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed
under Section 24 of C.P.C, to withdraw the
HMOP No.203 of 2021 on the file of the Sub Court,
Srivilliputhur and to transfer the same to the file of
the Sub Court, Kovilpatti.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Subash Babu
For Respondent : Mr.P.Athimoola Pandian
ORDER
This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has
been filed seeking transfer of the case in HMOP No.203
of 2021 from the Sub Court, Srivilliputhur to the
Sub Court, Kovilpatti.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD)No.9 of 2022
2.The marriage between the petitioner and
the respondent was solemnized on 01.07.2018 as per the
Hindu Rites and Customs. Due to difference of opinion,
they are living separately. Now the husband filed a
petition in HMOP No.203 of 2021 before the Sub Court,
Srivilliputhur seeking divorce. The petitioner claims
that she is residing at Vilathikulam in Tuiticorin
District and therefore she filed this petition seeking
transfer of the above proceedings to Kovilpatti on the
ground that the distance between Vilathikulam and
Kovilpatti is around 95 Kms, she is having a child of
eight months old and since no one is there to accompany
her, she finds it difficult to appear before the Court
by travelling such a long distance.
3.The learned Counsel for the respondent has
objected for transferring the case as prayed for and
requested to transfer to some other nearby court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD)No.9 of 2022
4.The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of
Amitha Shah vs- Virendar Lal Shah, reported
(2003)10 SCC 609 has held that the convenience of the
wife and more so of the child must be taken into
account while deciding the petition for transfer and in
the case of Rajani Kishor Paradeshi Vs Kishor Babulal
Paradeshi reported in (2005) 12 SCC 237, the Hon'ble
Apex Court has held that in such type of transfer
petitions, the convenience of the wife is to be
preferred over the convenience of the husband.
5.This Court being satisfied with the reasons
stated in the affidavit filed in support of this
petition and also taking into consideration that the
convenience of wife is to be taken into consideration
at the time of considering transfer petitions as held
by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments cited
supra, is inclined to allow the present petition.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD)No.9 of 2022
6.In the light of the above, this transfer civil
miscellaneous petition stands allowed with the
following directions:
(i) The proceedings in HMOP.No.203 of 2021
is withdrawn from the Sub Court, Srivilliputhur
and transferred to the Sub Court, Sattur.
(ii) The learned Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur,
is directed to send the above case records
within a period of fifteen days from the date
of receipt of a copy of this order to the
learned Sub Judge, Sattur, who in turn, on
receipt of the case, shall dispose of the same
as expeditiously as possible.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petition stands closed.
03.08.2022
Index: Yes/No
To
1.The Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur.
2.The Sub Judge, Sattur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD)No.9 of 2022
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
dsk
TR.C.M.P(MD)No.9 of 2022
03.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!