Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Muthukrishnan vs The Secretary To Government
2022 Latest Caselaw 13789 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13789 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2022

Madras High Court
R.Muthukrishnan vs The Secretary To Government on 3 August, 2022
                                                                      W.P.(MD)No.17961 of 2021


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 03.08.2022
                                                        CORAM:
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
                                                         AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA

                                         W.P.(MD)No.17961 of 2021 and
                                       WMP(MD) Nos.14833 and 14834 of 2021

                     R.Muthukrishnan                                     : Petitioner
                                                         Vs.
                     1.The Secretary to Government
                       Revenue Department
                       St. George Fort, Chennai.

                     2.The Special Commissioner,
                       Land Administrative Department
                       Chepauk, Chennai.

                     3.The District Collector
                       District Collectorate Premises
                       Sivagangai District

                     4.The District Revenue Officer,
                       Office of the District Revenue Office,
                       Sivagangai District

                     5.The Tahsildar,
                       Thiruppathur Taluk
                       Sivagangai District




                     1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                            W.P.(MD)No.17961 of 2021


                     6.The Executive Officer,
                       Thiruppathur Selection Grade Town Panchayat,
                       Thiruppathur Taluk, Sivagangai District

                     7.M/s.Thiruppathur Varthagar Sangam
                       Represented by its the Secretary
                       Big Bazaar Street,
                       Thiruppathur Taluk
                       Sivagangai District

                     8.M/s.Thiruppathur Varthagar Sangam
                       Represented by its
                       The President, North Car Street,
                       Thiruppathur Taluk
                       Sivagangai District

                     9.S.R.C.Lakshmanan                                        : Respondents

                     PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st to 6th
                     respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated
                     14.09.2021 and consequently direct the 1st to 3rd respondents initiate legal
                     action against the 7th and 8th respondents.


                                  For Petitioner            : Mr.V.A.Dhana Aravaindha Balaji
                                                            for M/s.Dhana Law Associates

                                  For Respondents           : Mr.A.K.Manikkam for R1 to R6
                                                            Special Government Pleader
                                                            Mr.M.Ajmal Khan for R7 to R9
                                                            Senior Counsel for
                                                            M/s.Ajmal Associates



                     2/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  W.P.(MD)No.17961 of 2021




                                                            ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.)

It is the case of the petitioner that the land measuring 6 acres and

52 cents in S.No.327 Thiruppathur Village, belonged to one Pallivasal as

per the settlement register of the year 1965 and the same has been

unlawfully assigned to the 7th respondent in the year 1975, to cancel

which, the present public interest litigation has been filed.

2.Today, Mr.A.Raja, Tahsildar(G.R.) Thiruppathur and

Mr.D.Venkatesh, Tahsildar (Regular), Thiruppathur are present.

3.On instructions, the learned Special Government Pleader

appearing for the respondents 1 to 6 submitted that the mutation of the

record was done in the year 1975 and in the year 1983, when the UDR

scheme was brought into force, S.No.327 was subdivided into 17 sub

divisions and in the revenue records, S.No.327/4 measuring one acre and

15 cents stands in the name of the 7th respondent.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.17961 of 2021

4.Mr.M.Ajmal Khan, learned Senior Counsel, appearing for the

respondents 7 to 9 submitted that since 1975, the respondent Nos.7 and 8

are in possession of the said land and the 7th respondent have built a

building in which there are tenants. Against some tenants, who were not

paying the rents, eviction proceedings was initiated by the 7th respondent

and the same are pending. The learned Senior Counsel further submitted

that there was a title suit in O.S.No.161/1959 before the District Munsif,

Sivagangai, between the Pallivasal (Mosque) and the 7th respondent, in

which, the 7th respondent succeeded by judgment and decree dated

31.08.1960 and only thereafter, the name of the 7th respondent was

included in the revenue records in the year 1975.

5. In our considered opinion, via a public interest litigation, an

entry that has been made in the revenue records as early as 1975 in

favour of the 7th respondent cannot be cancelled on the mere allegations

of the petitioner that they have encroached the land. In our considered

opinion, this public interest litigation is clearly an abuse of process of

law and therefore, deserves to be dismissed with exemplary cost of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) payable to the Gandhi Museum,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.17961 of 2021

within a period of four weeks from today and file a memo/compliance in

the Registry. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

[P.N.P., J.] & [R.H., J.] 03.08.2022 Internet : Yes RR To

1.The Secretary to Government Revenue Department St. George Fort, Chennai.

2.The Special Commissioner, Land Administrative Department Chepauk, Chennai.

3.The District Collector District Collectorate Premises Sivagangai District

4.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Office, Sivagangai District

5.The Tahsildar, Thiruppathur Taluk Sivagangai District

6.The Executive Officer, Thiruppathur Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Thiruppathur Taluk Sivagangai District

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.17961 of 2021

P.N.PRAKASH, J AND R.HEMALATHA, J

RR

7.The Curator Gandhi Museum Madurai 625 020

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.17961 of 2022

03.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter