Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arthanari Clothing Private Ltd. vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2022 Latest Caselaw 13761 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13761 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2022

Madras High Court
Arthanari Clothing Private Ltd. vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 2 August, 2022
                                                                                W.P.No.1059 of 2019

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 02.08.2022

                                                       CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

                                              W.P.No.1059 of 2019
                                                      and
                                          W.M.P.Nos.1189 & 1191 of 2019

                     Arthanari Clothing Private Ltd., HTSC No.225
                     68/2 B.Manalkadu,
                     Erumapalayam (PO)
                     Salem – 636 015 Rep by its
                     Authorised Signatory S.Y.Fazil                            .. Petitioner

                                                          Vs.
                     1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                       Rep. by its Secretary to Government,
                       Energy Department,
                       Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

                     2.The Chairman and Managing Director,
                       TANGEDCO Ltd.,
                       144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

                     3.The Accounts Officer/ Revenue
                       The Superintending Engineer Office,
                       Virudhunagar Electricity Distribution Circle,
                       TANGEDCO, Virudhunagar.                                 .. Respondents

                     Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 2nd and 3rd

                     1/5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                         W.P.No.1059 of 2019

                     respondents from demanding and collecting the tax on maximum demand
                     charges from the petitioner, in H.T. SC. No.225 as per the orders of the
                     Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, New Delhi on 31.08.2012 in SLP (C)
                     No.24993 of 2012 and 25522 of 2012 etc, Batch in M/s. Sri Krishna Alloys
                     & Etc., vs. Union of India and others etc.
                                               For Petitioner      : Mr.S.P.Parthasarathy
                                               For Respondents     : Mrs.V.Yamunadevi for R1
                                                                    Mr.M.Abul Kalam,
                                                                    Standing Counsel for R2 and R3

                                                                ORDER

The prayer in the Writ Petition reads as follows:

“to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 2nd and 3rd respondents from demanding and collecting the tax on maximum demand charges from the petitioner, in H.T. SC. No.225 as per the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, New Delhi on 31.08.2012 in SLP (C) No.24993 of 2012 and 25522 of 2012 etc, Batch in M/s. Sri Krishna Alloys & Etc., vs. Union of India and others etc.”

2. It is not in dispute that the right of the respondents to demand

and collect tax on the maximum demand charges has been affirmed by this

Court earlier and the same is under challenge before the Hon’ble Supreme

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1059 of 2019

Court. The Hon’ble Supreme Court had passed interim orders restraining

the Board from taking coercive steps for non-payment of tax on demand

charges. A Division Bench of this Court had also passed orders stating that

the ultimate fate of the cases would depend on the judgment of the Hon’ble

Supreme Court and the benefit of the interim order would enure to the

benefit of the consumers till then.

3. In view of the same, these Writ Petitions are disposed of with

the observation that the benefit of the interim orders of the Hon’ble Supreme

Court would enure to the petitioners also and the parties will abide by the

decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the pending Appeals before it. It

is made clear that the petitioners shall pay the other charges. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

02.08.2022 dsa Index:No Internet:Yes Speaking order

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1059 of 2019

To:-

1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Energy Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Chairman and Managing Director, TANGEDCO Ltd., 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

3.The Accounts Officer/ Revenue The Superintending Engineer Office, Virudhunagar Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, Virudhunagar.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1059 of 2019

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

dsa

W.P.No.1059 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos.1189 & 1191 of 2019

02.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter