Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thiyagarajan @ Malaiyandi vs State Through
2022 Latest Caselaw 13734 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13734 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2022

Madras High Court
Thiyagarajan @ Malaiyandi vs State Through on 2 August, 2022
                                                                           CRL.O.P(MD) No.13416 of 2022


                            BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   DATED: 02.08.2022

                                                         CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                              CRL.O.P(MD) No.13416 of 2022

                     1.Thiyagarajan @ Malaiyandi
                     2.Senthil @ Senthilkumar                   ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2

                                                           Vs

                     1.State through
                       The Inspector of Police,
                       Ponnamaravathi Police Station,
                       Pudukkottai District.
                       (In Crime No.269 of 2021)                ... 1st Respondent/Complainant

                     2.Sakthivel                           ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant

                     PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C,
                     praying to call for the records pertaining to the impugned F.I.R. in Crime
                     No.269 of 2021, dated 14.08.2021 on the file of the first respondent police
                     and to quash the same as illegal.


                                     For Petitioners :Mr.K.Sivabalan
                                     For R1         : Mr.A.Albert James
                                                      Government Advocate (Crl.side)

                                     For R2         : Mr.E.Balasubramanian


                     1/5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 CRL.O.P(MD) No.13416 of 2022


                                                            ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the F.I.R in

Crime No.269 of 2021, dated 14.08.2021 on the file of the first respondent

police.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complainant's wife is

the President of Alavayal Panchayat. One Palanivelu died by affecting

Corona virus. Hence, on 14.08.2021, the de facto complainant and his wife

made a campaign in the Alavayal Panchayat Marriage Hall with nurses for

putting vaccination for the Corono virus. At that time, at about 12.30 p.m.

the petitioners came there and scolded the de facto complainant by using

filthy languages for the reason that the wife of the de facto complainant has

stated that his father died due to corona virus. Both the petitioners attacked

the de facto complainant and caused injuries. Hence, the de facto

complainant gave a complaint and the case has been registered.

3.The case is still at the stage of investigation. By passage of time,

the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute

amicably among themselves.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P(MD) No.13416 of 2022

4.A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court

which have been signed by the petitioners and the second respondent and

also by their respective counsel. The petitioners and the second respondent

were also present in person before this Court and they were identified by

Mr.J.Sridharan, SSI of Police, Ponnamaravathi Police Station as well as by

the learned Counsels appearing for the parties. This Court also enquired

both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable

settlement between themselves.

5.In the instant case, the dispute is of personal in nature and the

parties had compromised. Where the parties have compromised the matter,

the High Court has to power to quash the complaint for the offence under

Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC.

6.The legal position expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case

of Gian Singh vs. State of Panjab and another reported in (2012)10 SCC

303 and Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath) reported

in (2017)9 SCC 641 were taken into consideration.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P(MD) No.13416 of 2022

7.In the light of the guidelines issued in the above said Judgments of

the Hon'ble Apex Court, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the

proceedings in Crime No.269 of 2021 pending before the first respondent

police, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature.

8.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a

sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.269 of 2021 on the file of the first

respondent police, is quashed insofar as the petitioners alone and the terms

of joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

02.08.2022

Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/no vsd

To

1.The Inspector of Police, Ponnamaravathi Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P(MD) No.13416 of 2022

V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

vsd

ORDER IN CRL.O.P(MD) No.13416 of 2022

02.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter