Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9081 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2022
Review Application No.28 of 2001
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
Review Application No.28 of 2001
in
C.M.A.No.3 of 2001
and
C.M.P.Nos.5090 to 5092 of 2001 & 7881 of 2005
M/s National Insurance Company Ltd.,
Divisional Office
No.III, Lakshmi Complex,
St. Mark's Road,
Bangalore – 1. ... Applicant
Vs.
1.Shoba
2.N.S.Kiran
3.N.S.Kishore
4.P.Saraswathiamma
5.A.N.Prakash
6.A.C.Nagubai
(5th respondent exparte before the Tribunal)
(Grounds amended as per order of
this Court dated 16.04.2001 in CMP No.6311/2001)
... Respondents
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Review Application No.28 of 2001
PRAYER: Review Application is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil
Procedure to review the Judgment and Decree dated 15.02.2001 made in CMA
No.3 of 2001 on the file of this Court.
For Appellant : Mr.T.M.Venkataraman
For Respondents : Mr.Dr.S.Nagaraj
ORDER
[Order of the Court was delivered by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.]
Heard Mr.T.M.Venkataraman, learned counsel appearing for the applicant
and Dr.S.Nagaraj, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2.The respondents 1 to 4 herein filed MCOP No.252 of 1989 seeking
compensation of Rs.30,00,000/- for the death of one P.Sivasankar in an accident
that took place on 23.10.1988, but the Tribunal has awarded Rs.13,00,000/- along
with interest. Questioning the same, the Insurance Company preferred an appeal
in CMA No.3 of 2001. The said appeal came to be dismissed for the reason that
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Review Application No.28 of 2001
they did not get permission under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, which is
mandatory at that relevant point of time. Unless the Insurance Company is
permitted to take defence under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, they are
not entitled to maintain the appeal. Therefore, we are of the view that there was
no error apparent on the face of the record. Hence, this Review Application is
dismissed.
3.It is represented that the applicant/Insurance Company has already
deposited entire award amount. Hence, the claimants are permitted to withdraw
their share as per the ratio fixed by the Tribunal. No costs. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
[M.K.K.S.,J.] [V.S.G.,J.]
28.04.2022
skn
Index : Yes/No
Speaking Order :Yes/No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Review Application No.28 of 2001
K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.
and V.SIVAGNANAM, J.
skn
Order made in Review Application No.28 of 2001 in C.M.A.No.3 of 2001 and C.M.P.Nos.5090 to 5092 of 2001 & 7881 of 2005
28.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!