Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8825 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2022
S.A.(MD)No.430 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
S.A.(MD)No.430 of 2013
S.Gandhimathi ... Defendant / Respondent / Appellant
-Vs-
1.Solaiappan (died) ... Plaintiff / Appellant / Respondent
2.Arukani Ammal ... Plaintiff / Appellant / Respondent
3.P.S.Muthukannu
4.S.Mallika
5.P.S.Ramesh Kumar ... Respondents
(Respondents 3 to 5 are brought on record as Lrs of the deceased
R1 vide order dated 21.04.2022 made in C.M.P.(MD)No.3099 of 2022)
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure
Code, to set aside the decree and judgment in A.S.No.111 of 2011 dated
31.10.2012 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Karur reversing the decree
and judgment in O.S.No.586 of 2008, dated 22.07.2011 on the file of the
Additional District Munsif, Karur by allowing the instant second appeal.
For Appellant : Mr.Raghuvaran Gopalan
for Mr.K.Prabhakar
For R2 & R5 : Mr.V.Balaji
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
S.A.(MD)No.430 of 2013
JUDGMENT
The defendant in O.S.No.586 of 2008 on the file of the Additional
District Munsif Court, Karur is the appellant in this second appeal.
2. The original respondents herein filed the said suit seeking
permanent injunction against the appellant and the same was dismissed by
the trial court vide judgment and decree dated 22.07.2011. Aggrieved by
the same, the plaintiffs filed A.S.No.111 of 2011 before the Principal Sub
Court, Karur. The decision of the trial court was reversed and the suit was
decreed. Challenging the same, this second appeal came to be filed.
During the pendency of the second appeal, Solaiappan / first plaintiff
passed away. His wife Arukani Ammal is already on record as second
respondent. The children were brought on record as R3 to R5.
3. During the pendency of this proceedings, the matter has been
amicably resolved. The respondents have compromised the issue between
themselves and have agreed to abide by the judgment and decree passed by
the trial court. To this effect, a memorandum of compromise has also been
entered into and the same has already been filed before this Court. In the
said memorandum of compromise dated 25.4.2022, the parties as well as
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.(MD)No.430 of 2013
the respective counsel have put their signatures. The appellant
Gandhimathi as well as the respondents are present before me. All of them
confirmed that they had voluntarily executed a joint compromise memo.
The second appeal is disposed of in terms of the joint compromise memo.
It shall form part of this decree. No cost.
26.04.2022
Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No rmi
NOTE: Issue Order Copy on 28.04.2022
To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Karur.
2.The Additional District Munsif, Karur.
Copy To The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.(MD)No.430 of 2013
G.R.SWAMINATHAN.J.,
rmi
Judgment made in S.A.(MD)No.430 of 2013
26.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!