Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8312 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2022
S.A.(MD)No.669 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 20.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
S.A.(MD) No.669 of 2010
1.Saradambal (Died)
2.Kalarani
3.Minor.Aravindakumar
4.Minor.Monisha .. Appellants/Appellants/
Plaintiffs
st
[1 appellant died and appellants 2 to 4, who are
already on record, are recorded as LRs of the
deceased 1st appellant vide order dated
21.02.2022 made in S.A.(MD) No.669 of 2010]
-vs-
1.Chinnaiyan (Died)
2.Jagatheesan @ C.N.Ananthan (Died) .. Respondents 1 & 2/
Respondents/Defendants
nd
[R1 Died and 2 respondent, who is already on
record, is recorded as LR of the deceased 1st
respondent vide order dated 21.02.2022 made in
S.A.(MD) No.669 of 2010]
3.Santhi .. 3rd Respondent
[R3 is suo motu impleaded as LR of the deceased
2nd respondent vide order dated 21.02.2022 made
in S.A.(MD) No.669 of 2010]
_________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.(MD)No.669 of 2010
Prayer :- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code
to set aside the judgment and decree in A.S.No.132 of 2005 dated
18.12.2008 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Kumakonam
confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.392 of 1993 dated
25.08.2005 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court,
Kumbakonam.
For Appellants : Mr.K.Govindarajan
RR1 & 2 : Died
For R3 : No appearance
******
JUDGMENT
This second appeal arises out of an injunction suit. The
unsuccessful plaintiffs are the appellants herein. A memo has been filed
by the learned counsel for the appellants that the property actually
belongs to Kasi Mutt, Thiruppanandal and that during the pendency of
these proceedings, the contestants passed away. The 1st appellant also is
no more. Her legal heirs are on record. It is stated that the legal heirs are
directly paying the rent to Kasi Mutt. In these circumstances, the
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.669 of 2010
appellants do not want to purse the second appeal. They seek leave to
withdraw.
2. Leave is granted. The second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
The memo dated 17.04.2022 signed by the 3rd appellant and the counsel
is taken on record. No costs.
20.04.2022 Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No
Note:-
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.
abr
To
1.The Additional Sub Judge, Kumakonam.
2.The I Additional District Munsif, Kumbakonam.
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.669 of 2010
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
abr
S.A.(MD) No.669 of 2010
20.04.2022
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!